Gershon Ben‐Shakhar
- Social Psychology top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Artificial Intelligence top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Eitan ElaadJohn J. FuredyItamar GatiBruno VerschuèreEwout H. MeijerArieh Y. ShalevNurit GronauNathalie klein Selle
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (86 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (36 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- IsraelNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gershon Ben‐Shakhar
130 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 135
- Social Psychology 3.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.2k
- Clinical Psychology 1.7k
- Artificial Intelligence 1.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 716
Countries citing papers authored by Gershon Ben‐Shakhar
This map shows the geographic impact of Gershon Ben‐Shakhar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gershon Ben‐Shakhar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gershon Ben‐Shakhar more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gershon Ben‐Shakhar
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gershon Ben‐Shakhar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gershon Ben‐Shakhar. The network helps show where Gershon Ben‐Shakhar may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gershon Ben‐Shakhar
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gershon Ben‐Shakhar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gershon Ben‐Shakhar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gershon Ben‐Shakhar. Gershon Ben‐Shakhar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 171 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 61 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 265 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Gershon Ben‐Shakhar
Gershon Ben‐Shakhar is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Decision Sciences, having authored 135 papers that have together received 4.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (86 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (36 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (3.1k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.2k citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.7k citations). Gershon Ben‐Shakhar has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eitan Elaad, John J. Furedy, Itamar Gati, Bruno Verschuère, Ewout H. Meijer, Arieh Y. Shalev, Nurit Gronau, Nathalie klein Selle, Tuvia Peri and Scott P. Orr. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Applied Psychology and American Psychologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.