Wolfgang Ambach
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Dieter VaitlRudolf StarkMartin PeperBertram WalterKatharina TabbertJan SchweckendiekChristian J. MerzTim Klucken
- Topics
- Deception detection and forensic psychology (13 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandIsrael
In The Last Decade
Wolfgang Ambach
22 papers receiving 328 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Cognitive Neuroscience 187
- Social Psychology 182
- Clinical Psychology 102
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
- Artificial Intelligence 66
Countries citing papers authored by Wolfgang Ambach
This map shows the geographic impact of Wolfgang Ambach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wolfgang Ambach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wolfgang Ambach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wolfgang Ambach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wolfgang Ambach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wolfgang Ambach. The network helps show where Wolfgang Ambach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wolfgang Ambach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wolfgang Ambach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wolfgang Ambach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wolfgang Ambach. Wolfgang Ambach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | Does a Modified Guilty Knowledge Test Reveal Anomalous Interactions within Pairs of participants?/?Revela Una Prueba Modificada De Conocimiento Culpable Interacciones Anomala En Pares De participantes?/Est-Ce Qu'un Test Modifie De Connaissance De Culpabilite Peut Reveler Des Interactions Anomales Entre Des Paires De ...? | 2 |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | Correlations between the EEGs of two spatially separated subjects − a replication study | 2 |
| 18 | 27 | |
| 19 | 60 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Wolfgang Ambach
Wolfgang Ambach is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 22 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (13 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (7 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (52 citations), Biological Psychiatry (36 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (187 citations). Wolfgang Ambach has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Dieter Vaitl, Rudolf Stark, Martin Peper, Bertram Walter, Katharina Tabbert, Jan Schweckendiek, Christian J. Merz, Tim Klucken, Matthias Gamer and Stefanie Lis. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, NeuroImage and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.