Gerda Lederer
Impact in
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cultural Differences and Values
- Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- German legal, social, and political studies
Papers in
-
- German legal, social, and political studies 2
- Sociology and Education Studies 2
- Italian Fascism and Post-war Society 1
- Eastern European Communism and Reforms 1
- Economic and Social Issues 1
- Youth Education and Societal Dynamics 1
-
- European history and politics 2
- Co-authors
- William F. Stone (2 shared papers)Richard Christie (2 shared papers)John Duckitt (1 shared paper)Peter R. Schmidt (1 shared paper)Peter Schmidt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Political Psychology (4 papers)Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology (1 paper)GESIS Data Archive (1 paper)VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Gerda Lederer
7 papers receiving 153 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Social Psychology 77
- Sociology and Political Science 132
- General Psychology 3
- Applied Psychology 10
- Political Science and International Relations 36
Countries citing papers authored by Gerda Lederer
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerda Lederer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerda Lederer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerda Lederer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerda Lederer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerda Lederer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerda Lederer. The network helps show where Gerda Lederer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Gerda Lederer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1995 | 112 | |
| 2 | Strength and Weakness | 1993 | 27 |
| 3 | 1982 | 18 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 1 |
About Gerda Lederer
Gerda Lederer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Cultural Studies, having authored 9 papers that have together received 190 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include German legal, social, and political studies (2 papers), Sociology and Education Studies (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (1 paper), Economic and Social Issues (1 paper) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (77 citations), Sociology and Political Science (132 citations), General Psychology (3 citations), Applied Psychology (10 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (36 citations). Gerda Lederer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include William F. Stone, Richard Christie, John Duckitt, Peter R. Schmidt and Peter Schmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Political Psychology, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, GESIS Data Archive, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.