Citations per year, relative to Gerardo Prieto Gerardo Prieto (= 1×)
peers
Friedrich Wilkening
Countries citing papers authored by Gerardo Prieto
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerardo Prieto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerardo Prieto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerardo Prieto more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerardo Prieto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerardo Prieto. The network helps show where Gerardo Prieto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerardo Prieto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerardo Prieto.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerardo Prieto based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gerardo Prieto. Gerardo Prieto is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Delgado, Ana R., et al.. (2020). Análisis de los instrumentos empleados en la investigación empírica de la regulación emocional. 14(1). 165–174.
3.
Hernández, Ana, Vicente Ponsoda, José Muñiz, Gerardo Prieto, & Paula Elosua. (2016). ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF TESTS IN SPAIN: REVISION OF THE SPANISH TEST REVIEW MODEL. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.2 indexed citations
4.
Hernández, Ana, et al.. (2016). REVISIÓN DEL MODELO PARA EVALUAR LA CALIDAD DE LOS TESTS UTILIZADOS EN ESPAÑA. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.15 indexed citations
5.
Prieto, Gerardo, et al.. (2014). Analysis of rater severity on written expression exam using Many Faceted Rasch Measurement. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México). 35(2). 385–397.9 indexed citations
Delgado, Ana R. & Gerardo Prieto. (2003). Diferencias sexuales en el acceso léxico al color. Psicothema. 15(3). 484–488.2 indexed citations
11.
Prieto, Gerardo, et al.. (2002). Construção de um teste de visualização a partir da psicologia cognitiva. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.9 indexed citations
12.
Burín, Débora Inés, Ana R. Delgado, & Gerardo Prieto. (2000). Solution strategies and gender differences in spatial visualization tasks. Psicologica. 21(2). 275–286.24 indexed citations
13.
Prieto, Gerardo & José Muñiz. (2000). Un modelo para evaluar la calidad de los tests utilizados en España. Papeles del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers. 65–72.10 indexed citations
14.
Prieto, Gerardo. (2000). Utilidad y representación en la psicometría actual. 2(2). 111–127.3 indexed citations
Palenzuela, David L., Gerardo Prieto, Ana R. Delgado, et al.. (1997). Versión española del pavlovian temperament survey (pts-s). Psicothema. 9(2). 291–304.2 indexed citations
17.
Prieto, Gerardo, et al.. (1993). Análisis cognitivo de un test informatizado de visualización espacial. Psicothema. 5(2). 293–301.2 indexed citations
18.
Prieto, Gerardo, et al.. (1993). Limitaciones de la investigación sobre las diferencias sexuales en cognición. Psicothema. 5(2). 419–437.5 indexed citations
19.
Carro, Juan, et al.. (1991). Diseño de un test computerizado para el análisis y la mediación de la aptitud de Relaciones Espaciales. 231–238.
20.
Prieto, Gerardo. (1979). Cambios evolutivos de la estructura de la aptitud espacial. Revista de psicología general y aplicada: Revista de la Federación Española de Asociaciones de Psicología. 34(159). 609–625.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.