Geraldine Mackenzie

546 total citations
31 papers, 340 citations indexed

About

Geraldine Mackenzie is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Law and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Geraldine Mackenzie has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 340 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 12 papers in Law and 9 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Geraldine Mackenzie's work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers), Law in Society and Culture (5 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers). Geraldine Mackenzie is often cited by papers focused on Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (9 papers), Law in Society and Culture (5 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (4 papers). Geraldine Mackenzie collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Geraldine Mackenzie's co-authors include Karen Gelb, Caroline Spiranovic, David Indermaur, Paul Glasziou, Lynne D. Roberts, Lucie Rychetnik, Rae Thomas, Jenny Doust, K Warner and Stacy M. Carter and has published in prestigious journals such as JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, BMJ Open and Group Decision and Negotiation.

In The Last Decade

Geraldine Mackenzie

29 papers receiving 313 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Geraldine Mackenzie Australia 9 171 59 50 50 42 31 340
Angela M. Jones United States 12 80 0.5× 21 0.4× 36 0.7× 56 1.1× 23 0.5× 40 475
Theodore Wilson United States 13 333 1.9× 40 0.7× 102 2.0× 8 0.2× 15 0.4× 34 559
Allison G. Smith United States 10 147 0.9× 53 0.9× 28 0.6× 7 0.1× 62 1.5× 12 320
Dhruv Sharma United States 12 62 0.4× 55 0.9× 11 0.2× 16 0.3× 44 1.0× 43 382
Jim Kelly United States 12 162 0.9× 37 0.6× 40 0.8× 7 0.1× 15 0.4× 68 516
Takayoshi Terashita Japan 6 69 0.4× 63 1.1× 14 0.3× 14 0.3× 19 0.5× 17 279
Nicole Reynolds United States 6 197 1.2× 63 1.1× 71 1.4× 24 0.5× 9 0.2× 16 582
David O. Fakunle United States 8 152 0.9× 85 1.4× 39 0.8× 3 0.1× 25 0.6× 13 357
Deborah Hellman United States 11 94 0.5× 122 2.1× 12 0.2× 55 1.1× 6 0.1× 41 579
Stephen John United Kingdom 12 230 1.3× 98 1.7× 7 0.1× 5 0.1× 31 0.7× 43 483

Countries citing papers authored by Geraldine Mackenzie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geraldine Mackenzie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geraldine Mackenzie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geraldine Mackenzie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geraldine Mackenzie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geraldine Mackenzie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geraldine Mackenzie. The network helps show where Geraldine Mackenzie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geraldine Mackenzie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geraldine Mackenzie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geraldine Mackenzie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geraldine Mackenzie. Geraldine Mackenzie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rana, Rajib, Siddique Latif, Raj Gururajan, et al.. (2019). Automated screening for distress: A perspective for the future. European Journal of Cancer Care. 28(4). e13033–e13033. 33 indexed citations
4.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2014). Measuring the Effects of Small Group Deliberation on Public Attitudes towards Sentencing: Benefits and Challenges. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. 25(3). 745–761. 3 indexed citations
5.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2013). Staying focused on the big picture: Should Australia legislate for corporate manslaughter based on the United Kingdom model?. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 37(2). 99–113. 1 indexed citations
6.
Rychetnik, Lucie, Stacy M. Carter, Julia Abelson, et al.. (2013). Enhancing Citizen Engagement in Cancer Screening Through Deliberative Democracy. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 105(6). 380–386. 54 indexed citations
7.
Indermaur, David, Lynne D. Roberts, Caroline Spiranovic, Geraldine Mackenzie, & Karen Gelb. (2012). A matter of judgement: The effect of information and deliberation on public attitudes to punishment. Punishment & Society. 14(2). 147–165. 45 indexed citations
8.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, Caroline Spiranovic, K Warner, et al.. (2012). Sentencing and public confidence: Results from a national Australian survey on public opinions towards sentencing. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 45(1). 45–65. 32 indexed citations
9.
Mackenzie, Geraldine. (2011). The Queensland Sentencing Advisory Council. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 3 indexed citations
10.
Spiranovic, Caroline, Lynne D. Roberts, David Indermaur, et al.. (2011). Public preferences for sentencing purposes: What difference does offender age, criminal history and offence type make?. Criminology & Criminal Justice. 12(3). 289–306. 17 indexed citations
11.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2009). Evaluating the performance of Indigenous sentencing courts. Bond University Research Portal (Bond University). 13(2). 90–105. 2 indexed citations
12.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2009). Homicide in abusive relationships: a report on defences. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 1. 2 indexed citations
13.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2008). Mandatory Sentences in South Africa: Lessons for Australia?. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology. 41(3). 402–420. 3 indexed citations
14.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2007). 'What really happened' versus 'What we can prove': tension between the roles of Coroner and DPP in Queensland. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 6(24). 6. 3 indexed citations
15.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2007). Decision support for criminal sentencing and plea bargaining. University of Southern Queensland ePrints (University of Southern Queensland). 49–59. 2 indexed citations
16.
Zeleznikow, John, et al.. (2007). Bargaining in the shadow of the law - using utility functions to support legal negotiation. 237–246. 14 indexed citations
17.
Mackenzie, Geraldine. (2005). A question of balance: How judges sentence. 1 indexed citations
18.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (2004). Building a Foundation for Systems Change: Increasing Access to Physical Activity Programs for Older Adults. Health Promotion Practice. 5(4). 451–458. 8 indexed citations
19.
Mackenzie, Geraldine, et al.. (1998). Queensland sentencing manual. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 4 indexed citations
20.
Mackenzie, Geraldine. (1994). The chicken or the egg: standards or solutions for electronic records. ePublications@SCU (Southern Cross University). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026