Henrik Tham

577 citations
31 papers · 300 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Henrik Tham

30 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers

Henrik Tham
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Sociology and Political Science 184
  • Political Science and International Relations 67
  • Law 26
  • Public Administration 9
  • General Health Professions 47
Replace Stan Stojkovic with:
Stan Stojkovic United States
Paul Ponsaers Belgium
Willem de Lint Canada
Helen Taylor Greene United States
Rolando V. del Carmen United States
Reino Sirén Finland
Andrew Karmen United States
John Ortiz Smykla United States
Andrew M. Jefferson Denmark
Viviana Andreescu United States
Henrik Tham relative to Stan Stojkovic United States Stan Stojkovic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Stan Stojkovic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Henrik Tham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henrik Tham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henrik Tham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henrik Tham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henrik Tham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henrik Tham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henrik Tham. The network helps show where Henrik Tham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Henrik Tham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Henrik Tham Line = papers co-authored together Henrik Tham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200165
2 199541
3 200523
4 201522
5 201118
6 201017
7
Kriminalpolitik : Brott och straff i Sverige sedan 1965
201816
8 199812
9 200911
10 198911
11
Forskare om narkotikapolitiken
20038
12 20096
13 20006
14 20245
15 20125
16 19904
17
Svenskarnas syn på straff
20104
18 19933
19 20103
20 19923

About Henrik Tham

Henrik Tham is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Education, Clinical Psychology and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 31 papers that have together received 300 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (7 papers), Social and Educational Sciences (4 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (4 papers), European and International Law Studies (3 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper) and Gender Politics and Representation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (184 citations), Political Science and International Relations (67 citations), Law (26 citations), Public Administration (9 citations) and General Health Professions (47 citations). Henrik Tham has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Denmark and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include Hanns von Hofer, Monica Lindgren, Johann Packendorff and Felipe Estrada. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Criminology, Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention, Punishment & Society, European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research and European J of International Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact