This map shows the geographic impact of K Warner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by K Warner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites K Warner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by K Warner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by K Warner. The network helps show where K Warner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of K Warner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of K Warner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of K Warner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with K Warner. K Warner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Warner, K, et al.. (2018). Sentencing discounts for delay. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
6.
Warner, K, et al.. (2018). Aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing: Comparing the views of judges and jurors. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
7.
Warner, K, et al.. (2018). Aggravating or Mitigating? Comparing Judges’ and Jurors’ Views on Four Ambiguous Sentencing Factors. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
8.
Warner, K, et al.. (2017). The purposes of punishment: how do judges apply a legislative statement of sentencing purposes. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
9.
Warner, K & Lorana Bartels. (2015). Juvenile Sex Offending: Its Prevalence and the Criminal Justice Response. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
10.
Warner, K. (2014). The Australian national jury sex offence sentencing study. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
11.
Warner, K. (2013). Sex Offence Sentencing. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).
12.
Warner, K. (2013). Setting the boundaries of child sexual assault: consent and mistake as to age defences. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
13.
Warner, K. (2013). Prison television and sexuality. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 19(2).1 indexed citations
14.
Warner, K, et al.. (2011). Interviewing the jury: Three case studies from the Tasmanian jury sentencing study. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
15.
Warner, K. (2010). Sentencing for child pornography. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).9 indexed citations
16.
Warner, K, et al.. (2009). Gauging Public Opinion on Sentencing: Can Asking Jurors Help?. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice. 1–6.2 indexed citations
17.
Warner, K. (2005). Sexual Offending: Victim, Gender and Sentencing Dilemmas. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
18.
Warner, K, et al.. (2002). Sentencing in Tasmania. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
19.
Warner, K, et al.. (2002). Physical Punishment of Children. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.