George Strawn

44 papers receiving 250 citations

Peers

George Strawn
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Computer Science Applications 41
  • Information Systems and Management 45
  • Management Information Systems 50
  • Information Systems 74
  • Management Science and Operations Research 31
Replace Peter A. Freeman with:
Peter A. Freeman United States
Shigeo Sugimoto Japan
Gabriel Huecas Spain
César D. Guerrero Colombia
S. Dutta United States
Rohiza Ahmad Malaysia
Antonio Ruiz‐Martínez Spain
Amit Verma United States
Paul Pocatilu Romania
Michael C. Daconta United States
George Strawn relative to Peter A. Freeman United States Peter A. Freeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
Peter A. Freeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Strawn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Strawn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Strawn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Strawn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Strawn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Strawn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Strawn. The network helps show where George Strawn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside George Strawn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George Strawn Line = papers co-authored together George Strawn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Scientific Research: How Many Paradigms?.
201242
2 201722
3 201520
4 202115
5 197712
6 201411
7 201610
8 20219
9 20199
10 20227
11 19917
12 20147
13 20227
14 20147
15 20236
16
Ready, Set, GO FAIR: Accelerating Convergence to an Internet of FAIR Data and Services.
20186
17 20166
18 20165
19 20145
20 20165

About George Strawn

George Strawn is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 49 papers that have together received 267 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Computing Technologies (13 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (6 papers), Research Data Management Practices (5 papers), Scientific Computing and Data Management (5 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (4 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (4 papers), Social Issues and Policies (3 papers) and Data Quality and Management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (41 citations), Information Systems and Management (45 citations), Management Information Systems (50 citations), Information Systems (74 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (31 citations). George Strawn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include E.K. Track, Peter Wittenburg, Erik Schultes, Keith Jeffery, Barend Mons, Sallie Keller‐McNulty, Christine R. Kirkpatrick, Michael Stebbins, Amy Brand and Henry E. Schaffer. Their work appears in journals such as IT Professional, Data Intelligence, Computer, Computing in Science & Engineering and Software Practice and Experience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact