Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS
1992947 citationsJoseph Walls, George R. Widmeyer et al.Information Systems Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by George R. Widmeyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of George R. Widmeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George R. Widmeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George R. Widmeyer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George R. Widmeyer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George R. Widmeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George R. Widmeyer. The network helps show where George R. Widmeyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George R. Widmeyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George R. Widmeyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George R. Widmeyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George R. Widmeyer. George R. Widmeyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Widmeyer, George R., et al.. (2009). Exploring Students’ Reactions to Virtual Worlds. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 656.1 indexed citations
4.
Widmeyer, George R., et al.. (2009). Affordances of Virtual World Commerce: Instrument Development and Validation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 304.6 indexed citations
5.
Widmeyer, George R., et al.. (2009). An Exploratory Review of Design Principles in Constructivist Gaming Learning Environments. The Journal of Information and Systems in Education. 20(3). 289–300.20 indexed citations
Widmeyer, George R., et al.. (2008). Toward an Engaging Learning Experience for Students. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 125.2 indexed citations
Widmeyer, George R., et al.. (2007). Fun, Simple and Instructive: Towards a Design Theory for a Constructivist Gaming Learning Environment. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 478.1 indexed citations
Berkeley, Dina, George R. Widmeyer, Patrick Brézillon, & Vladislav Rajkovič. (1998). Context Sensitive Decision Support Systems. IFIP advances in information and communication technology.22 indexed citations
16.
Ives, Blake, George R. Widmeyer, & Michael Parks. (1995). The Electronic Commerce Course: An Early Vision of Learning in a Networked World. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 385–386.2 indexed citations
17.
Walls, Joseph, George R. Widmeyer, & Omar A. El Sawy. (1992). Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research. 3(1). 36–59.947 indexed citations breakdown →
Widmeyer, George R., et al.. (1986). Shopping in the Electronic Marketplace. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2(4). 21–35.25 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.