George N. Mbata
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 28
- Insect and Pesticide Research 27
- Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control 18
- Insect Pheromone Research and Control 9
- Plant Science top 2%
- Insect Pest Control Strategies 61
- Agricultural pest management studies 23
-
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior 11
- Food Science top 10%
-
- Insect Resistance and Genetics 22
- Co-authors
- David I. Shapiro‐IlanThomas W. PhillipsMark E. PaytonSonny B. RamaswamyShengqiang ShuPaul R. ArmstrongJames F. CampbellGeorge Opit
- Journals
- Postharvest Biology and Technology (1 paper)International Journal for Parasitology (1 paper)Pest Management Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNigeriaGhana
In The Last Decade
George N. Mbata
84 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Insect Science 993
- Plant Science 1.1k
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 185
- Genetics 173
- Food Science 111
Countries citing papers authored by George N. Mbata
This map shows the geographic impact of George N. Mbata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George N. Mbata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George N. Mbata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George N. Mbata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George N. Mbata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George N. Mbata. The network helps show where George N. Mbata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside George N. Mbata, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 27 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 15 | 2004 | 43 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 59 | |
| 17 | 2000 | 10 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 10 | |
| 19 | Insecticidal action of preparations from the brown pepper, piper guineense, schum seeds to callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) | 1995 | 9 |
| 20 | 1993 | 2 |
About George N. Mbata
George N. Mbata is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (61 papers), Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (28 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (27 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (23 papers), Insect Resistance and Genetics (22 papers), Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control (18 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (11 papers) and Insect Pheromone Research and Control (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (993 citations), Plant Science (1.1k citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (185 citations). George N. Mbata has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Nigeria and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include David I. Shapiro‐Ilan, Thomas W. Phillips, Mark E. Payton, Sonny B. Ramaswamy, Shengqiang Shu, Paul R. Armstrong, James F. Campbell, George Opit, Enoch Adjei Osekre and S. Ramaswamy. Their work appears in journals such as Postharvest Biology and Technology, International Journal for Parasitology and Pest Management Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.