George H. Daniels
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- Co-authors
- David J. RothmanSilvio A. BediniMark RoseRichard F. HirshThomas P. HughesBruce SinclairDavid J. JeremyA. Hunter Dupree
- Topics
- History of Science and Natural History (9 papers)History of Science and Medicine (9 papers)Research, Science, and Academia (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
George H. Daniels
29 papers receiving 315 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- History and Philosophy of Science 79
- Sociology and Political Science 79
- Political Science and International Relations 46
- Clinical Psychology 46
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 25
Countries citing papers authored by George H. Daniels
This map shows the geographic impact of George H. Daniels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George H. Daniels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George H. Daniels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George H. Daniels
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George H. Daniels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George H. Daniels. The network helps show where George H. Daniels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George H. Daniels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George H. Daniels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George H. Daniels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George H. Daniels. George H. Daniels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | Nineteenth-century American science;: A reappraisal | 22 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | Darwinism comes to America | 1 |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About George H. Daniels
George H. Daniels is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 32 papers that have together received 407 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (9 papers), History of Science and Medicine (9 papers) and Research, Science, and Academia (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (79 citations), General Psychology (12 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (10 citations). George H. Daniels has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include David J. Rothman, Silvio A. Bedini, Mark Rose, Richard F. Hirsh, Thomas P. Hughes, Bruce Sinclair, David J. Jeremy, A. Hunter Dupree, John S. Haller and Robin Gaines Lanzi. Their work appears in journals such as Science, American Journal of Preventive Medicine and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.