Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations
2020167 citationsJorge Perdigão, Edson Araújo et al.Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of George Gomes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Gomes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Gomes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Gomes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Gomes. The network helps show where George Gomes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Gomes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Gomes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Gomes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with George Gomes. George Gomes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Perdigão, Jorge, et al.. (2020). Adhesive dentistry: Current concepts and clinical considerations. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 33(1). 51–68.167 indexed citations breakdown →
Gomes, George, et al.. (2013). Método de Avaliação da Defesa Antioxidante: Uma Revisão de Literatura Methods of the Antioxidant Defense: A Literature Review.1 indexed citations
5.
Perdigão, Jorge, George Gomes, & Ana Sezinando. (2011). Bonding ability of three ethanol-based adhesives after thermal fatigue.. PubMed. 24(3). 159–64.6 indexed citations
6.
Perdigão, Jorge, Ana Sezinando, & George Gomes. (2011). In vitro sealing potential of a self-adhesive pit and fissure sealant.. PubMed. 42(5). e60–4.9 indexed citations
7.
Perdigão, Jorge, Ana Sezinando, & George Gomes. (2011). Microtensile bond strengths and interfacial examination of a polyalkenoate-based 1-step adhesive.. PubMed. 24(4). 215–20.6 indexed citations
Perdigão, Jorge, et al.. (2007). Restoring teeth with prefabricated fiber-reinforced resin posts.. PubMed. 19(6). 359–64; quiz 365.6 indexed citations
16.
Perdigão, Jorge, George Gomes, & Manuela Lopes. (2006). Influence of conditioning time on enamel adhesion.. PubMed. 37(1). 35–41.48 indexed citations
17.
Perdigão, Jorge & George Gomes. (2006). Effect of instrument lubricant on the cohesive strength of a hybrid resin composite.. PubMed. 37(8). 621–5.18 indexed citations
18.
Perdigão, Jorge, et al.. (2006). In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I--microtensile bond strengths.. PubMed. 8(6). 367–73.81 indexed citations
19.
Perdigão, Jorge, George Gomes, Sillas Duarte, & Manuela Lopes. (2005). Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer.. PubMed. 30(4). 492–9.59 indexed citations
20.
Perdigão, Jorge, et al.. (2001). Effect of calcium removal on dentin bond strengths.. PubMed. 32(2). 142–6.60 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.