George Easton
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Communication top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Joey F. GeorgeGregory B. NorthcraftJ. F. NunamakerJay F. NunamakerMark PendergastMichael A. BelchVikas N. O’Reilly-ShahScott Gillespie
- Topics
- Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers)Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers)Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers)
- Journals
- Information & ManagementInformation Systems ResearchJournal of Management Information Systems
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George Easton
11 papers receiving 386 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Social Psychology 302
- Communication 296
- Sociology and Political Science 76
- Information Systems and Management 73
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 50
Countries citing papers authored by George Easton
This map shows the geographic impact of George Easton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Easton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Easton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George Easton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Easton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Easton. The network helps show where George Easton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Easton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Easton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Easton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Easton. George Easton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Manager-researcher relationships | 2 |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 246 | |
| 12 | 87 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | Group decision support systems vs. face-to-face communication for collaborative group work : an experimental investigation | 14 |
About George Easton
George Easton is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology and Information Systems and Management, having authored 14 papers that have together received 418 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (296 citations), Social Psychology (302 citations) and Information Systems and Management (73 citations). George Easton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Joey F. George, Gregory B. Northcraft, J. F. Nunamaker, Jay F. Nunamaker, Mark Pendergast, Michael A. Belch, Vikas N. O’Reilly-Shah, Scott Gillespie, John M. Penrose and Alan R. Dennis. Their work appears in journals such as Information & Management, Information Systems Research and Journal of Management Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.