George B. Kish

1.1k citations
46 papers · 851 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

George B. Kish

46 papers receiving 687 citations

Peers

George B. Kish
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 199
  • Social Psychology 230
  • Applied Psychology 56
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 178
  • Sensory Systems 40
Replace Edward L. Walker with:
Edward L. Walker United States
Clark L. Hull United States
Robert W. Earl United States
Edward C. Simmel United States
Charles L. Richman United States
Lawrence V. Harper United States
G. E. McClearn Sweden
Fred A. Masterson United States
James H. Korn United States
Jesse E. Gordon United States
George B. Kish relative to Edward L. Walker United States Edward L. Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Edward L. Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George B. Kish

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George B. Kish's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George B. Kish with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George B. Kish more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George B. Kish

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George B. Kish. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George B. Kish. The network helps show where George B. Kish may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside George B. Kish, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with George B. Kish Line = papers co-authored together George B. Kish links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1955116
2 197285
3 198053
4 196944
5 196842
6 197139
7 195734
8 197629
9 197328
10 198925
11 196924
12 197023
13 196221
14 196121
15 196021
16 195520
17 195619
18 196916
19 196115
20 196215

About George B. Kish

George B. Kish is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 851 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological and Educational Research Studies (10 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (199 citations), Social Psychology (230 citations), Applied Psychology (56 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (178 citations) and Sensory Systems (40 citations). George B. Kish has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gregory V. Donnenwerth, Alan Baron, William Busse, Joseph J. Antonitis, Robert B. Ellsworth, F. Keller, James A. Dinsmoor, Jonathan Barnes, Allan Frankel and Robert G. Gibby. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Community Psychology, Journal of Counseling Psychology and The Journal of General Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact