George A. Hillery
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 10%
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 2%
- Demography top 5%
- Co-authors
- David M. HummonMartin BulmerMichael BellMary Ann ClawsonMary Jo NeitzDonald I. WarrenAngela A. AidalaL. Richard Della Fave
- Topics
- Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers)Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers)Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George A. Hillery
47 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Sociology and Political Science 704
- General Health Professions 261
- Education 124
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 102
- Demography 97
Countries citing papers authored by George A. Hillery
This map shows the geographic impact of George A. Hillery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George A. Hillery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George A. Hillery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George A. Hillery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George A. Hillery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George A. Hillery. The network helps show where George A. Hillery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George A. Hillery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George A. Hillery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George A. Hillery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George A. Hillery. George A. Hillery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 86 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 97 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | Selected Issues in Community Theory. | 5 |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Definitions of community : Areas of Agreementbreakdown → | 617 |
About George A. Hillery
George A. Hillery is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 50 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion and Society Interactions (5 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (4 papers) and Social and Cultural Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (704 citations), Urban Studies (85 citations) and Communication (91 citations). George A. Hillery has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David M. Hummon, Martin Bulmer, Michael Bell, Mary Ann Clawson, Mary Jo Neitz, Donald I. Warren, Angela A. Aidala, L. Richard Della Fave, Donald J. Shoemaker and Helen Rose Ebaugh. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Sociological Review and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.