Geoffrey Warwick

740 citations
14 papers · 433 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Geoffrey Warwick

14 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Geoffrey Warwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Neurology 94
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 166
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 16
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 54
  • Physiology 48
Replace Hani Aiash with:
Hani Aiash United States
Gabriella Pezzuto Italy
Alice Perlowski United States
Bernt B. Aarli Norway
María Belén Alonso Ortiz Spain
Eric Derom Belgium
Tariq Cheema United States
Michiel Bannier Netherlands
Aliaë Mohamed-Hussein Egypt
Atsuyuki Watanabe Japan
Geoffrey Warwick relative to Hani Aiash United States Hani Aiash's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Hani Aiash · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Warwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Warwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Warwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Warwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Warwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Warwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Warwick. The network helps show where Geoffrey Warwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geoffrey Warwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geoffrey Warwick Line = papers co-authored together Geoffrey Warwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2020113
2 2008113
3 201344
4 200944
5 201928
6 201417
7 200915
8 201615
9 201815
10 201214
11 201210
12 20102
13
Improving outcomes in patients with cystic fibrosis.
20112
14 20171

About Geoffrey Warwick

Geoffrey Warwick is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Failure Treatment and Management (2 papers), Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (2 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (2 papers), Asthma and respiratory diseases (2 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (1 paper) and Renal cell carcinoma treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (94 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (166 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (16 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (54 citations) and Physiology (48 citations). Geoffrey Warwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Deborah Yates, Paul S. Thomas, Paul S. Thomas, Kai Lee, Laura‐Jane Smith, Surinder S. Birring, Patricia Macedo, Sam Norton, Michael D Waller and Caroline J. Jolley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Breath Research, European Respiratory Review, Lung Cancer, European Respiratory Journal and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact