Geoffrey Lovelace
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 2%
- Geophysics top 5%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Ocean Engineering top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mark ScheelHarald PfeifferBéla SzilágyiLarry KidderMichael BoyleTony ChuDaniel A. HembergerAlessandra Buonanno
- Topics
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (37 papers)Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (31 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Geoffrey Lovelace
37 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.2k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 759
- Geophysics 316
- Oceanography 195
- Ocean Engineering 183
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Lovelace
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Lovelace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Lovelace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Lovelace more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Lovelace
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Lovelace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Lovelace. The network helps show where Geoffrey Lovelace may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey Lovelace
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey Lovelace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey Lovelace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey Lovelace. Geoffrey Lovelace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | A catalog of 171 high-quality binary black-hole simulations for gravitational-wave astronomy | 2 |
| 9 | Accurate modeling of inspiral-merger-ringdown waveforms from non-precessing, spinning black-hole binaries | 0 |
| 10 | 63 | |
| 11 | 232 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 173 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | Mapping spacetime geometry with gravitational wave observatories | 1 |
| 19 | 68 | |
| 20 | 153 |
About Geoffrey Lovelace
Geoffrey Lovelace is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Ocean Engineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (37 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (31 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.2k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (759 citations) and Geophysics (316 citations). Geoffrey Lovelace has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark Scheel, Harald Pfeiffer, Béla Szilágyi, Larry Kidder, Michael Boyle, Tony Chu, Daniel A. Hemberger, Alessandra Buonanno, Robert Owen and Andrea Taracchini. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.