Mark Scheel
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 0.1%
- Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 157
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 105
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 73
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 38
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.5%
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 51
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena 8
- Geophysics top 1%
- Oceanography top 1%
- Geophysics and Gravity Measurements 11
- Ocean Engineering top 0.5%
- Geophysics and Sensor Technology 7
- Co-authors
- Larry KidderHarald PfeifferSaul A. TeukolskyBéla SzilágyiMichael BoyleAlessandra BuonannoFrançois FoucartGeoffrey Lovelace
- Journals
- Physical review. D (71 papers)Classical and Quantum Gravity (16 papers)Physical Review Letters (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyCanada
In The Last Decade
Mark Scheel
167 papers receiving 9.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 8.9k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3.2k
- Geophysics 1.2k
- Oceanography 807
- Ocean Engineering 624
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Scheel
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Scheel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Scheel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Scheel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Scheel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Scheel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Scheel. The network helps show where Mark Scheel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Scheel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 30 | |
| 15 | 2021 | 17 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 53 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 21 | |
| 18 | Black Hole Ringdown: The Importance of Overtonesbreakdown → | 2019 | 196 |
| 19 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 20 | A catalog of 171 high-quality binary black-hole simulations for gravitational-wave astronomy | 2013 | 2 |
About Mark Scheel
Mark Scheel is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Geophysics, having authored 171 papers that have together received 9.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (157 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (105 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (73 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (51 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (38 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (11 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (8 papers) and Geophysics and Sensor Technology (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (8.9k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3.2k citations) and Geophysics (1.2k citations). Mark Scheel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Larry Kidder, Harald Pfeiffer, Saul A. Teukolsky, Béla Szilágyi, Michael Boyle, Alessandra Buonanno, François Foucart, Geoffrey Lovelace, Matthew Duez and Yi Pan. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal Letters and Computer Physics Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.