Geoff Smith

1.9k citations
22 papers · 1.3k · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Geoff Smith

22 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Geoff Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 795
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 748
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 455
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 116
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
Replace Ned Kirsch with:
Ned Kirsch United States
Frank M. Webbe United States
Wm. Drew Gouvier United States
Ken McFarland Australia
Eric A. Zillmer United States
Mauricio A. García-Barrera Canada
James A. Holdnack United States
Benjamin D. Hill United States
Hua Jin China
Dominika Dykiert United Kingdom
Geoff Smith relative to Ned Kirsch United States Ned Kirsch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Ned Kirsch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoff Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff Smith. The network helps show where Geoff Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Geoff Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Geoff Smith Line = papers co-authored together Geoff Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000488
2 2003330
3 2002133
4 2001125
5 200462
6 200845
7 200637
8 201325
9 200423
10 201718
11 201810
12 201410
13 20168
14 20176
15 20036
16 20145
17 20155
18 20144
19 20092
20 20142

About Geoff Smith

Geoff Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, General Health Professions, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 22 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (795 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (748 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (455 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (116 citations) and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations). Geoff Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Elizabeth A. Maylor, Robert H. Logie, Sergio Della Sala, John R. Crawford, John W. Shepherd, Adam Rutland, David P. Carey, Daniel T. Smith, William G. Honer and G. William MacEwan. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Memory, Cortex, Psychopathology and Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact