Geoff Plant

17 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Geoff Plant
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 285
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 194
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 98
  • Artificial Intelligence 76
  • Social Psychology 71
Replace Lawrence Brancazio with:
Lawrence Brancazio United States
Jennell Vick United States
Aaron D. Mitchel United States
Lorin Lachs United States
Max Siegel United States
Marie-Vee Santana United States
Verena G. Skuk Germany
Kevin J. P. Woods United States
Christopher J. Darwin United Kingdom
Kerry P. Green United States
Geoff Plant relative to Lawrence Brancazio United States Lawrence Brancazio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Lawrence Brancazio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Geoff Plant

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Geoff Plant's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoff Plant with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoff Plant more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Geoff Plant

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoff Plant. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoff Plant. The network helps show where Geoff Plant may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoff Plant

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoff Plant. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoff Plant based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoff Plant. Geoff Plant is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 7
2 1
3 268
4
Speech Training for Young Adults Who Are Congenitally Deaf: A Case Study.
1
5 10
6 2
7
Relationship of aided speech recognition to hearing thresholds and aided speech-peak sensation levels in severely and profoundly hearing-impaired adults.
5
8 5
9 65
10 8
11
Two speech discrimination tests for profoundly hearing impaired children
1
12 12
13 5
14
A single-channel vibrotactile aid to lipreading: Preliminary results with an experienced subject
6
15
Lipreading with minimal auditory cues
5
16 17
17 6

About Geoff Plant

Geoff Plant is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Music and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (7 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (4 papers) and Tactile and Sensory Interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (285 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (194 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (98 citations). Geoff Plant has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Bulgaria and United States. Frequent co-authors include P. A. Busby, Mark Gregory, Barbara Dodd, J. H. Macrae, Harvey Dillon, D. Byrne and David Franklin. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Ear and Hearing and Speech Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026