Gene M. Smith

47 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Gene M. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 148
  • Clinical Psychology 318
  • Applied Psychology 71
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 86
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 234
Replace Alex Baldacchino with:
Alex Baldacchino United Kingdom
Barry I. Liskow United States
Gerardo González United States
Margaret Rukstalis United States
Raphael J. Leo United States
Henrick J. Harwood United States
Mary C. Dufour United States
Robert I. Block United States
Joseph F. Lucke United States
Lisa Jackson Pulver Australia
Gene M. Smith relative to Alex Baldacchino United Kingdom Alex Baldacchino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Alex Baldacchino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gene M. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gene M. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene M. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene M. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gene M. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene M. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene M. Smith. The network helps show where Gene M. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gene M. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gene M. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Gene M. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991235
2 1964187
3
An experimental pain method sensitive to morphine in man: the submaximum effort tourniquet technique.
1966163
4 1967123
5
Textbook of Anaesthesia
1996104
6 195985
7 197966
8 196861
9 196251
10 199445
11 197445
12 196637
13 196936
14 201235
15 199335
16 196031
17 196230
18 196229
19 196728
20 195627

About Gene M. Smith

Gene M. Smith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (7 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (5 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (5 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Assays (3 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (2 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (148 citations), Clinical Psychology (318 citations), Applied Psychology (71 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (86 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (234 citations). Gene M. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Henry K. Beecher, H. H. Bendixen, Jere Mead, A. R. Aitkenhead, Robert Markowitz, Lawrence D. Egbert, Frederick Mosteller, Jane M. Murphy, Michael S. Jellinek and Peter M. Bentler. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Journal of Applied Psychology, Journal of the American Medical Association, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics and Nursing Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact