Gemma Olivé-Cirera
About
In The Last Decade
Gemma Olivé-Cirera
6 papers receiving 25 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 20
- Neurology 20
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 7
- Epidemiology 6
- Infectious Diseases 3
- Molecular Biology 3
Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Olivé-Cirera
This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Olivé-Cirera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Olivé-Cirera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Olivé-Cirera more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Olivé-Cirera
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Olivé-Cirera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Olivé-Cirera. The network helps show where Gemma Olivé-Cirera may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gemma Olivé-Cirera
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gemma Olivé-Cirera. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gemma Olivé-Cirera based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gemma Olivé-Cirera. Gemma Olivé-Cirera is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.