Ge Yang

50 papers receiving 761 citations

Peers

Ge Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
  • Internal Medicine 164
  • Media Technology 125
  • Biophysics 55
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 167
  • Emergency Medical Services 42
Replace Ali Mottaghi with:
Ali Mottaghi United States
Zaid Bin Mahbub Bangladesh
A.K. Ray India
Angelica I. Avilés-Rivero United Kingdom
Roshan M. D’Souza United States
Ayush Goyal India
Mingrui Yang United States
Ahmad P. Tafti United States
Ali Mousavi United Kingdom
S. Gonzalez Canada
Ge Yang relative to Ali Mottaghi United States Ali Mottaghi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×54.7×
Ali Mottaghi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ge Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ge Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ge Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ge Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ge Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ge Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ge Yang. The network helps show where Ge Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ge Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ge Yang Line = papers co-authored together Ge Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007171
2 2004111
3 200495
4 200258
5 200537
6 201828
7 202125
8 202121
9 202121
10 200621
11 202120
12 200717
13 200516
14 200114
15 202113
16 202212
17 20199
18 20049
19 20008
20 20228

About Ge Yang

Ge Yang is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 52 papers that have together received 802 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods (7 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Advanced Neural Network Applications (6 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (5 papers), Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection (5 papers), Advanced Database Systems and Queries (5 papers), Image Processing Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Cell Image Analysis Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (164 citations), Media Technology (125 citations), Biophysics (55 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (167 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (42 citations). Ge Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Bradley J. Nelson, Alpesh Amin, Jay Lin, Gagan Agrawal, Ruoming Jin, J. A. Gaines, Haijie Wang, Joyce H. Keyak, G. Lin and William C. Tang. Their work appears in journals such as Multimedia Tools and Applications, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Future Generation Computer Systems, Chemical Engineering Science and Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact