Gao Ling

1.5k citations
62 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Gao Ling

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Gao Ling
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Social Psychology 461
  • Clinical Psychology 291
  • Health 65
  • Marketing 81
  • Sociology and Political Science 320
Replace Joonha Park with:
Joonha Park Japan
Renée J. Bator United States
Norma De Piccoli Italy
Lauren E. Mullenbach United States
Brian Bishop Australia
Wen Zhong-lin China
Lijuan Cui China
Bryan Smale Canada
Alec M. Gallup United States
Liuna Geng China
Gao Ling relative to Joonha Park Japan Joonha Park's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Joonha Park · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gao Ling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gao Ling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gao Ling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gao Ling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gao Ling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gao Ling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gao Ling. The network helps show where Gao Ling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gao Ling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gao Ling Line = papers co-authored together Gao Ling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021155
2 2019152
3 2017107
4 202076
5 201672
6 200965
7 201763
8 202042
9 202236
10 202135
11 202034
12 202034
13 202134
14 202028
15 202017
16 202416
17 199515
18 202214
19 202313
20 202112

About Gao Ling

Gao Ling is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Education, Sociology and Political Science and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 62 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (17 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (8 papers), Civil and Geotechnical Engineering Research (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (6 papers), Atmospheric aerosols and clouds (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (4 papers) and Geomechanics and Mining Engineering (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (461 citations), Clinical Psychology (291 citations), Health (65 citations), Marketing (81 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (320 citations). Gao Ling has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Xingchao Wang, Jiping Yang, Fengqing Zhao, Pengcheng Wang, Li Lei, Farrukh Shahzad, Asif Razzaq, Tehreem Fatima, Li Yang and Caiyu Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology in the Schools, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Journal of Youth and Adolescence, Journal of Affective Disorders and Children and Youth Services Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact