Gabriel Schaer

689 total citations
8 papers, 521 citations indexed

About

Gabriel Schaer is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Surgery and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Gabriel Schaer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 521 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cancer Research, 4 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Gabriel Schaer's work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers). Gabriel Schaer is often cited by papers focused on Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (5 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (4 papers) and Cancer Cells and Metastasis (2 papers). Gabriel Schaer collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Austria and Chile. Gabriel Schaer's co-authors include Dimitri Sarlos, Igor Langer, L. Bronz, Edward Wight, Mathias K. Fehr, Gilles Berclaz, Markus Zuber, Ulrich Güller, Daniel Burger and Ossi R. Koechli and has published in prestigious journals such as Annals of Surgery, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Clinica Chimica Acta.

In The Last Decade

Gabriel Schaer

8 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Gabriel Schaer Switzerland	7	275	253	188	165	89	8	521
Dahlia M. Sataloff United States	12	204 0.7×	342 1.4×	293 1.6×	186 1.1×	41 0.5×	26	702
V. Girardi Italy	12	169 0.6×	85 0.3×	142 0.8×	161 1.0×	22 0.2×	21	394
Won Sup Yoon South Korea	10	102 0.4×	85 0.3×	78 0.4×	31 0.2×	117 1.3×	44	369
Remmert K. Storm Netherlands	6	201 0.7×	261 1.0×	69 0.4×	220 1.3×	17 0.2×	7	497
Maryam Kadivar Iran	12	100 0.4×	46 0.2×	121 0.6×	53 0.3×	64 0.7×	40	341
Susan Chafe Canada	13	115 0.4×	320 1.3×	96 0.5×	132 0.8×	22 0.2×	23	582
Kiyoshi Kubochi Japan	10	202 0.7×	56 0.2×	212 1.1×	39 0.2×	21 0.2×	30	433
Valerio Sciascia Italy	8	244 0.9×	131 0.5×	125 0.7×	90 0.5×	10 0.1×	16	357
L. Weir Canada	10	422 1.5×	753 3.0×	334 1.8×	449 2.7×	16 0.2×	21	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Gabriel Schaer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gabriel Schaer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gabriel Schaer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gabriel Schaer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gabriel Schaer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gabriel Schaer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gabriel Schaer. The network helps show where Gabriel Schaer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gabriel Schaer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gabriel Schaer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gabriel Schaer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gabriel Schaer. Gabriel Schaer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Sarlos, Dimitri, et al.. (2014). Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 212(6). 824.e1–824.e3. 9 indexed citations

Langer, Igor, Ulrich Güller, Mathias Worni, et al.. (2013). Bone Marrow Micrometastases Do Not Impact Disease-Free and Overall Survival in Early Stage Sentinel Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 21(2). 401–407. 6 indexed citations

Sarlos, Dimitri, et al.. (2010). Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: Outcome and cost analyses of a matched case–control study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 150(1). 92–96. 141 indexed citations

Langer, Igor, Ulrich Güller, Gilles Berclaz, et al.. (2008). Accuracy of frozen section of sentinel lymph nodes: a prospective analysis of 659 breast cancer patients of the Swiss multicenter study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 113(1). 129–136. 32 indexed citations

Sarlos, Dimitri, et al.. (2008). Radioguided occult lesion localization (ROLL) for treatment and diagnosis of malignant and premalignant breast lesions combined with sentinel node biopsy: A prospective clinical trial with 100 patients. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 35(4). 403–408. 24 indexed citations

Langer, Igor, Ulrich Güller, Gilles Berclaz, et al.. (2007). Morbidity of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLN) Alone Versus SLN and Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection After Breast Cancer Surgery. Annals of Surgery. 245(3). 452–461. 285 indexed citations

Langer, Igor, Ulrich Güller, Ossi R. Koechli, et al.. (2007). Association of the Presence of Bone Marrow Micrometastases with the Sentinel Lymph Node Status in 410 Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients: Results of the Swiss Multicenter Study. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 14(6). 1896–1903. 12 indexed citations

Ottiger, Cornelia, Gabriel Schaer, & Andreas Huber. (2006). Time-course of quantitative urinary leukocytes and bacteria counts during antibiotic therapy in women with symptoms of urinary tract infection. Clinica Chimica Acta. 379(1-2). 36–41. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact