Gábor Gaszner
About
In The Last Decade
Gábor Gaszner
5 papers receiving 329 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Gastroenterology 154
- Molecular Biology 147
- Biological Psychiatry 120
- Physiology 77
- Surgery 49
Countries citing papers authored by Gábor Gaszner
This map shows the geographic impact of Gábor Gaszner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gábor Gaszner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gábor Gaszner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gábor Gaszner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gábor Gaszner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gábor Gaszner. The network helps show where Gábor Gaszner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gábor Gaszner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gábor Gaszner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gábor Gaszner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gábor Gaszner. Gábor Gaszner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 102 | |
| 2 | 109 | |
| 3 | 131 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | [Paralytic ileus during haloperidol therapy]. | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.