G. W. Barrett

1.3k total citations
10 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

G. W. Barrett is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, G. W. Barrett has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 4 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in G. W. Barrett's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (4 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers). G. W. Barrett is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (6 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (4 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers). G. W. Barrett collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Canada. G. W. Barrett's co-authors include Harry F. Recher, Hugh Ford, S. McIntyre, Denis A. Saunders, David B. Lindenmayer, Adrian D. Manning, Julian Seddon, Paul Ryan, Joern Fischer and Phil Gibbons and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, BioScience and Biological Conservation.

In The Last Decade

G. W. Barrett

10 papers receiving 925 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G. W. Barrett Australia	10	740	657	270	262	177	10	1.0k
Harriet A.C. Eeley South Africa	13	415 0.6×	375 0.6×	237 0.9×	220 0.8×	220 1.2×	14	831
Robert Lambeck Australia	6	678 0.9×	561 0.9×	460 1.7×	323 1.2×	168 0.9×	9	1.1k
Daniel R. Petit United States	15	925 1.3×	560 0.9×	267 1.0×	262 1.0×	344 1.9×	27	1.2k
Gregory O. Vigle United States	5	405 0.5×	475 0.7×	327 1.2×	147 0.6×	262 1.5×	6	839
Jenny Stott Australia	9	391 0.5×	307 0.5×	240 0.9×	167 0.6×	199 1.1×	9	722
Louis A. Hansen Denmark	9	534 0.7×	492 0.7×	269 1.0×	404 1.5×	178 1.0×	12	910
Roger Prodon France	18	627 0.8×	522 0.8×	375 1.4×	276 1.1×	220 1.2×	49	977
Nárgila Moura Brazil	13	414 0.6×	549 0.8×	406 1.5×	196 0.7×	252 1.4×	17	930
Phil Gibbons Australia	9	311 0.4×	361 0.5×	270 1.0×	160 0.6×	133 0.8×	11	670
Eric Yensen United States	13	759 1.0×	510 0.8×	296 1.1×	170 0.6×	321 1.8×	37	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Barrett

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Barrett

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Barrett. The network helps show where G. W. Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. W. Barrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. W. Barrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. W. Barrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. W. Barrett. G. W. Barrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Dorrough, Josh, et al.. (2012). Differential responses of plants, reptiles and birds to grazing management, fertilizer and tree clearing. Austral Ecology. 37(5). 569–582. 48 indexed citations

2.

Barrett, G. W., et al.. (2008). Colonisation of native tree and shrub plantings by woodland birds in an agricultural landscape. Wildlife Research. 35(1). 19–32. 53 indexed citations

3.

Gibbons, Phil, David B. Lindenmayer, Joern Fischer, et al.. (2008). The Future of Scattered Trees in Agricultural Landscapes. Conservation Biology. 22(5). 1309–1319. 214 indexed citations

4.

Barrett, G. W., et al.. (2007). Comparison of atlas data to determine the conservation status of bird species in New South Wales, with an emphasis on woodland-dependent species. Australian Zoologist. 34(1). 37–77. 42 indexed citations

5.

Ford, Hugh, G. W. Barrett, Denis A. Saunders, & Harry F. Recher. (2001). Why have birds in the woodlands of Southern Australia declined?. Biological Conservation. 97(1). 71–88. 306 indexed citations

6.

Barrett, G. W., Hugh Ford, & Harry F. Recher. (1994). Conservation of woodland birds in a fragmented rural landscape. Pacific Conservation Biology. 1(3). 245–256. 128 indexed citations

7.

McIntyre, S., G. W. Barrett, R. L. Kitching, & Harry F. Recher. (1992). Species Triage—Seeing Beyond Wounded Rhinos. Conservation Biology. 6(4). 604–606. 41 indexed citations

8.

McIntyre, S. & G. W. Barrett. (1992). Habitat Variegation, An Alternative to Fragmentation. Conservation Biology. 6(1). 146–147. 170 indexed citations

9.

Barrett, G. W.. (1989). A sustainable society. BioScience. 39(11). 754–754. 10 indexed citations

10.

Gregory, Philip A., et al.. (1981). Importance of Social Grouping on Bioenergetics of the Golden Mouse, Ochrotomys nuttalli. Journal of Mammalogy. 62(3). 628–630. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact