Tom Hildebrandt
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- David G. SchlundtJames W. LangenbucherRobyn SyskoRebecca GreifD. Catherine WalkerBarbara S. McCradyKatharine L. LoebJanet D. Latner
- Topics
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors (68 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (21 papers)Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Tom Hildebrandt
105 papers receiving 3.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 120
- Clinical Psychology 2.5k
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 551
- Sociology and Political Science 448
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 408
- Applied Psychology 361
Countries citing papers authored by Tom Hildebrandt
This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Hildebrandt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Hildebrandt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Hildebrandt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Hildebrandt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Hildebrandt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Hildebrandt. The network helps show where Tom Hildebrandt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Hildebrandt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Hildebrandt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Hildebrandt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Hildebrandt. Tom Hildebrandt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 21 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 140 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 22 | |
| 19 | 52 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Tom Hildebrandt
Tom Hildebrandt is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 107 papers that have together received 3.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (68 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (21 papers) and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.5k citations), Applied Psychology (361 citations) and Pharmacy (350 citations). Tom Hildebrandt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David G. Schlundt, James W. Langenbucher, Robyn Sysko, Rebecca Greif, D. Catherine Walker, Barbara S. McCrady, Katharine L. Loeb, Janet D. Latner, B. Timothy Walsh and Dorian Hunter‐Reel. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Genetics and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.