G. Scholten
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Physiology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Wim E. J. M. GhijsenV.M. WiegantDavid G. NichollsHarvey T. McMahonMatthijs VerhageFrans BoomsmaP. C. DiegenbachAmanda J. Kiliaan
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers)Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers)Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsBulgariaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G. Scholten
12 papers receiving 523 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 308
- Molecular Biology 304
- Cell Biology 167
- Physiology 72
- Cognitive Neuroscience 38
Countries citing papers authored by G. Scholten
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Scholten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Scholten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Scholten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Scholten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Scholten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Scholten. The network helps show where G. Scholten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Scholten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Scholten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Scholten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Scholten. G. Scholten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 288 | |
| 10 | Metabolic specialization of spinal neurons and the myotomal muscle in post-hatching stages of the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. A histochemical study. | 9 |
| 11 | Myofibrillar differences among mammalian skeletal muscle fibres at the ultrastructural level. A comparison of immunocytochemical and morphometrical parameters. | 8 |
| 12 | 57 |
About G. Scholten
G. Scholten is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Cell Biology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 534 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (4 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers) and Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (308 citations), Cell Biology (167 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (34 citations). G. Scholten has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Bulgaria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Wim E. J. M. Ghijsen, V.M. Wiegant, David G. Nicholls, Harvey T. McMahon, Matthijs Verhage, Frans Boomsma, P. C. Diegenbach, Amanda J. Kiliaan, A. G. Miriam Leenders and J. A. Groot. Their work appears in journals such as Neuron, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.