G. P. Mould
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Oncology
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
- Co-authors
- Stephen H. CurryV. MarksMalcolm LaderG. Wynne AherneE. M. PiallWilliam F. WhiteKarim MeeranAndrew T. Hattersley
- Topics
- Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (4 papers)Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (4 papers)Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSingaporeSweden
In The Last Decade
G. P. Mould
29 papers receiving 460 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 126
- Pharmacology 94
- Oncology 83
- Pharmacology 82
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 78
Countries citing papers authored by G. P. Mould
This map shows the geographic impact of G. P. Mould's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. P. Mould with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. P. Mould more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. P. Mould
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. P. Mould. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. P. Mould. The network helps show where G. P. Mould may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. P. Mould
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. P. Mould. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. P. Mould based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. P. Mould. G. P. Mould is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | The interaction between methotrexate and probenecid in man [proceedings]. | 10 |
| 15 | 86 | |
| 16 | Proceedings: Clinical pharmacology of chlorpromazine. | 5 |
| 17 | Pharmacology of chlorpromazine: clinical studies. | 2 |
| 18 | 41 | |
| 19 | Destruction of chlorpromazine during absorption by rat intestine in vitro. | 5 |
| 20 | 22 |
About G. P. Mould
G. P. Mould is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (4 papers), Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects (4 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (82 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (126 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (19 citations). G. P. Mould has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Singapore and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Stephen H. Curry, V. Marks, Malcolm Lader, G. Wynne Aherne, E. M. Piall, William F. White, Karim Meeran, Andrew T. Hattersley, Shaun Kilminster and J. A. Sutton. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, British Journal of Pharmacology and Clinical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.