Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings
This map shows the geographic impact of Malcolm Lader's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Malcolm Lader with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Malcolm Lader more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Malcolm Lader. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Malcolm Lader. The network helps show where Malcolm Lader may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Malcolm Lader
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Malcolm Lader.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Malcolm Lader based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Malcolm Lader. Malcolm Lader is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Edwards, Griffith & Malcolm Lader. (1994). Addiction : processes of change. Oxford University Press eBooks.17 indexed citations
6.
Dratcu, Luiz & Malcolm Lader. (1993). Ansiedade: conceito, classificacao e biologia: uma interpretacao contemporanea da literatura. Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria. 42(1). 19–32.6 indexed citations
7.
Lader, Malcolm, Griffith Edwards, & Colin Drummond. (1992). The Nature of alcohol and drug related problems. Cambridge University Press eBooks.67 indexed citations
8.
Edwards, Griffith & Malcolm Lader. (1990). The Nature of drug dependence. Oxford University Press eBooks.42 indexed citations
9.
Higgitt, Anna, Susan Golombok, Peter Fonagy, & Malcolm Lader. (1987). Group Treatment of Benzodiazepine Dependence. British Journal of Addiction. 82(5). 517–532.33 indexed citations
10.
Pétursson, Hannes & Malcolm Lader. (1984). Dependence on tranquilizers. Oxford University Press eBooks.30 indexed citations
11.
Lader, Malcolm. (1983). Mental disorders and somatic illness. Cambridge University Press eBooks.1 indexed citations
12.
Praag, H. M. van, et al.. (1981). Drug treatment in psychiatry-psychotropic drugs. M. Dekker eBooks.4 indexed citations
13.
Praag, H. M. van, Malcolm Lader, Ole J. Rafaelsen, & Edward J. Sachar. (1981). Practical applications of psychotropic drugs and other biological treatments. M. Dekker eBooks.1 indexed citations
14.
Praag, H. M. van, Malcolm Lader, Ole J. Rafaelsen, & Edward J. Sachar. (1980). Brain mechanisms and abnormal behavior--genetics and neuroendocrinology. M. Dekker eBooks.2 indexed citations
15.
Praag, H. M. van, Malcolm Lader, Ole J. Rafaelsen, & Edward J. Sachar. (1980). Brain mechanisms and abnormal behavior--psychophysiology. M. Dekker eBooks.2 indexed citations
16.
Lader, Malcolm. (1980). Priorities in psychiatric research. John Wiley eBooks.1 indexed citations
Lader, Malcolm. (1975). The psychophysiology of mental illness.106 indexed citations
20.
Lader, Malcolm. (1969). Studies of anxiety.28 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.