G. O. Sperber

1.5k citations
40 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

G. O. Sperber

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

G. O. Sperber
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Ophthalmology 498
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 483
  • Neurology 59
  • Neurology 108
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 109
Replace Robert W. Flower with:
Robert W. Flower United States
Michele Della Corte Italy
Y Kitazawa Japan
Tsutomu Igarashi Japan
L. Sallmann United States
Per G. Söderberg Sweden
Clyde Markowitz United States
Andrea Russo Italy
Masato Kobayashi Japan
Kazumasa Okada Japan
G. O. Sperber relative to Robert W. Flower United States Robert W. Flower's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Robert W. Flower · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. O. Sperber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. O. Sperber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. O. Sperber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. O. Sperber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. O. Sperber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. O. Sperber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. O. Sperber. The network helps show where G. O. Sperber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. O. Sperber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. O. Sperber Line = papers co-authored together G. O. Sperber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990229
2 1983110
3 200887
4 199079
5 198754
6 199453
7 198651
8 198550
9 198749
10 198446
11 199040
12 198735
13 198834
14 199331
15 198630
16 198724
17
Comparison of retinal transit times and retinal blood flow: a study in monkeys.
200120
18 199316
19 200215
20 199414

About G. O. Sperber

G. O. Sperber is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Neurology, Ophthalmology and Molecular Biology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (14 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (9 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (8 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (4 papers) and Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (498 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (483 citations), Neurology (59 citations), Neurology (108 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (109 citations). G. O. Sperber has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, Slovakia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include A. Bill, Anders Ericsson, A. Hemmingsson, Jonas Blomberg, Farid Benachenhou, B. Jung, Vidar Blikstad, Sohan Singh Hayreh, Lennart Dencker and Roland d'Argy. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Experimental Neurology, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Acta Radiologica and Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact