Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial
2006945 citationsPeter A. Ringleb, J.-R. Allenberg et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of G Klein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G Klein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G Klein more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G Klein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G Klein. The network helps show where G Klein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G Klein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G Klein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G Klein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G Klein. G Klein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ringleb, Peter A., J.-R. Allenberg, H. Brückmann, et al.. (2006). 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 368(9543). 1239–1247.945 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Klein, G, et al.. (2006). Efficacy and tolerance of an oral enzyme combination in painful osteoarthritis of the hip. A double-blind, randomised study comparing oral enzymes with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.. PubMed. 24(1). 25–30.32 indexed citations
Kullich, Werner & G Klein. (1996). [Possible effect of hormones on immune and inflammatory processes in female patients with chronic polyarthritis].. PubMed. 23(4). 119–23.3 indexed citations
Kullich, Werner, et al.. (1994). [Determination of serum pepsinogen I and II for assessment of gastroduodenal tolerance of S(+) ibuprofen].. PubMed. 106(7). 208–11.3 indexed citations
12.
Lämmer, Johannes, et al.. (1991). Biliary Expandable Metal Stents. Seminars in Interventional Radiology. 8(4). 233–241.8 indexed citations
Klein, G, et al.. (1984). [Lipoprotein Lp(a) as a risk factor for heart infarct--a family study].. PubMed. 134(18). 403–8.1 indexed citations
17.
Klein, G. (1977). [Pathogenetic concept of experimental mycoplasma arthritis].. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 95(7). 408–13.1 indexed citations
18.
Auböck, L, et al.. (1974). [New ultrastructural findings in the synovial membrane in progressive chronic polyarthritis].. PubMed. 33(3). 87–106.4 indexed citations
19.
Klein, G, et al.. (1972). [Arthropathia sclerodermica of the hands and its differential diagnosis from progressive chronic polyarthritis].. PubMed. 84(2). 27–9.1 indexed citations
20.
Klein, G, et al.. (1963). [On the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis with special reference to mediastinoscopy].. PubMed. 17. 217–26.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.