Thomas Slaughter

45 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Thomas Slaughter
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Biochemistry 242
  • Hematology 79
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 19
  • Surgery 208
  • Internal Medicine 14
Replace Wolf Dietrich with:
Wolf Dietrich Germany
H. Neuhof Germany
Jonathan Francis Critchlow United States
R J Hawker United Kingdom
W. Inauen Switzerland
Kathleen A. Butler United States
Carl Maximilian Kirchmaier Germany
Michele Nutini Italy
Ana Peña France
Leonard D. Miller United States
Thomas Slaughter relative to Wolf Dietrich Germany Wolf Dietrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Wolf Dietrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Slaughter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Slaughter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Slaughter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Slaughter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Slaughter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Slaughter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Slaughter. The network helps show where Thomas Slaughter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Slaughter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Slaughter Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Slaughter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992147
2 1994114
3 2001113
4 1998104
5 199768
6 199667
7 200566
8 200065
9 199758
10 200153
11 199751
12 199743
13 200042
14 199541
15 200533
16 199328
17 199526
18 200726
19 200219
20 201118

About Thomas Slaughter

Thomas Slaughter is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Surgery, Hematology, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Blood transfusion and management (8 papers), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (4 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (3 papers), Anesthesia and Sedative Agents (2 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (1 paper), Anesthesia and Pain Management (1 paper), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (1 paper) and Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (242 citations), Hematology (79 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (19 citations), Surgery (208 citations) and Internal Medicine (14 citations). Thomas Slaughter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Argentina and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles S. Greenberg, Thung‐S. Lai, Komandoor E. Achyuthan, C S Greenberg, John B. Leslie, Ajeet D. Sharma, Gautam M. Sreeram, Habib E. El-Moalem, Ian J. Welsby and Joann M. Hettasch. Their work appears in journals such as Anesthesia & Analgesia, Anesthesiology, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact