Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Radiation-Pressure Acceleration of Ion Beams Driven by Circularly Polarized Laser Pulses
2009374 citationsA. Henig, Sven Steinke et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Laser-driven soft-X-ray undulator source
2009270 citationsJens Osterhoff, R. Hörlein et al.profile →
Generation of Stable, Low-Divergence Electron Beams by Laser-Wakefield Acceleration in a Steady-State-Flow Gas Cell
2008171 citationsJens Osterhoff, Zs. Major et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of D. Habs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Habs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Habs more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Habs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Habs. The network helps show where D. Habs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Habs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Habs.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Habs based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with D. Habs. D. Habs is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lång, Christian, D. Habs, Katia Parodi, & P. G. Thirolf. (2013). Sub-millimeter nuclear medical imaging with reduced dose application in positron emission tomography using beta-gamma coincidences. arXiv (Cornell University).5 indexed citations
Hegelich, B. M., Liang Yin, B. J. Albright, et al.. (2010). Laser-driven Ion-, electron- and photon-beams from relativistically overdense plasmas. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 52.1 indexed citations
Henig, A., Sven Steinke, M. Schnürer, et al.. (2009). Radiation-Pressure Acceleration of Ion Beams Driven by Circularly Polarized Laser Pulses. Physical Review Letters. 103(24). 245003–245003.374 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Hegelich, B. M., L. Yin, B. J. Albright, et al.. (2008). Towards GeV laser-driven ion acceleration. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 50.1 indexed citations
Csige, L., M. Csatlós, T. Faestermann, et al.. (2007). New excited states and fission resonances in the actinide region. Acta Physica Polonica B. 38(4). 1503–1507.1 indexed citations
Hunyadi, M., M. Csatlós, Y. Eisermann, et al.. (1999). Hyperdeformed Rotational Bands in 234 U. Acta Physica Polonica B. 30(5). 1467.1 indexed citations
18.
Jaeschke, E., Monika Blum, Alexander Friedrich, et al.. (1990). First electron cooling of heavy ions at the new Heidelberg Storage Ring TSR. CERN Bulletin. 32. 97–104.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.