G. Hancock
Impact in
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Spectroscopy and Laser Applications
-
- Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Papers in
- Spectroscopy 21
- Spectroscopy and Laser Applications 20
- Finance 10
- Financial Markets and Investment Strategies 8
- Co-authors
- Jean‐Paul BoothJoshua B. HalpernK. H. WelgeJames D. CampbellM. LenziM. J. ToogoodM. H. BrookerJoseph G. Shapter
- Journals
- Chemical Physics Letters (12 papers)Applied Physics Letters (2 papers)Journal of Business Finance & Accounting (2 papers)Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films (2 papers)Journal of Futures Markets (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
G. Hancock
45 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Spectroscopy 498
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 587
- Atmospheric Science 253
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 77
- Filtration and Separation 15
Countries citing papers authored by G. Hancock
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Hancock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Hancock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Hancock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Hancock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Hancock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Hancock. The network helps show where G. Hancock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Hancock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hedging with VIX Futures: What is the Optimal Hedge Ratio? | 2013 | 3 |
| 2 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 22 | |
| 8 | 1989 | 124 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 13 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 28 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 64 | |
| 12 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1983 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1981 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1980 | 13 | |
| 16 | 1979 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1979 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1978 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1976 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1976 | 42 |
About G. Hancock
G. Hancock is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Finance, Atmospheric Science, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (20 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (13 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (10 papers), Laser Design and Applications (9 papers), Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (8 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (5 papers), Plasma Applications and Diagnostics (5 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (498 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (587 citations), Atmospheric Science (253 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (77 citations) and Filtration and Separation (15 citations). G. Hancock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Paul Booth, Joshua B. Halpern, K. H. Welge, James D. Campbell, M. Lenzi, K. H. Welge, M. J. Toogood, M. H. Brooker, Joseph G. Shapter and Kenneth G. McKendrick. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Physics Letters, Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films and Journal of Futures Markets.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.