G. Fillion
About
In The Last Decade
G. Fillion
111 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Molecular Biology 770
- Condensed Matter Physics 640
- Geophysics 600
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 599
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 394
Countries citing papers authored by G. Fillion
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Fillion's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Fillion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Fillion more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Fillion
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Fillion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Fillion. The network helps show where G. Fillion may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Fillion
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Fillion. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Fillion based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Fillion. G. Fillion is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | Peter Senge's Learning Organization: A Critical View and the Addition of Some New Concepts to Actualize Theory and Practice | 15 |
| 3 | Family Business Succession: How Men and Women Predecessors Can Bring Credibility to Their Successors? | 6 |
| 4 | Family Business Succession: What Are the Ways Used by the Men Business Managers to Legitimize Their Successors? | 2 |
| 5 | Testing Utaut on the Use of Erp Systems by Middle Managers and End-Users of Medium- to Large-Sized Canadian Enterprises | 15 |
| 6 | Integrating Ict into Higher Education at the University of Moncton: A Study of Onsite vs Online Students' Perceptions | 4 |
| 7 | Testing a Moderator-Type Research Model on the Use of High Speed Internet | 1 |
| 8 | Interpretation of low-temperature data part 4: The low-temperature magnetic transition of monoclinic pyrrhotite | 16 |
| 9 | Knowledge Management Capabilities Consensus: Evidence from a Delphi Study | 1 |
| 10 | Testing a Moderator-Type Research Model on the Use of Mobile Phone | 3 |
| 11 | Integrating ICT into Higher Education: Investigating Onsite and Online Professors' Points of View | 6 |
| 12 | Integrating ICT into higher education: Investigating onsite and online students' points of view | 1 |
| 13 | Integrating ICT into Higher Education: A Study of Onsite vs Online Students' Perceptions | 13 |
| 14 | Acquiring Domain Knowledge of Information Systems: The Information System upon Information Systems Approach | 6 |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | Publishing in the Organizational Sciences: An Extended Literature Review on the Dimensions and Elements of an Hypothetico-Deductive Scientific Research, and Some Guidelines on "How" and "When" They Should Be Integrated | 5 |
| 17 | High pressure magnetic transition in monoclinic pyrrhotite (Fe7S8) and impact demagnetization on Mars | 1 |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 36 | |
| 20 | 27 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.