G. Edward Cartier
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Organic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Baldomero M. OliveraJ. Michael McIntoshDoju YoshikamiSiqin LuoWilliam R. GrayRichard B. JacobsenMaren WatkinsJennifer M. Kulak
- Topics
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (11 papers)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of the American Chemical SocietyJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- United StatesPhilippines
In The Last Decade
G. Edward Cartier
12 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Molecular Biology 1.3k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 373
- Pharmacology 130
- Insect Science 124
- Organic Chemistry 75
Countries citing papers authored by G. Edward Cartier
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Edward Cartier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Edward Cartier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Edward Cartier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Edward Cartier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Edward Cartier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Edward Cartier. The network helps show where G. Edward Cartier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Edward Cartier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Edward Cartier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Edward Cartier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Edward Cartier. G. Edward Cartier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 46 | |
| 2 | Venomous gastropods: Conus, conoideans and other neogastropod families | 4 |
| 3 | 137 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 127 | |
| 6 | 97 | |
| 7 | 253 | |
| 8 | 102 | |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 68 | |
| 11 | 443 | |
| 12 | 9 |
About G. Edward Cartier
G. Edward Cartier is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Organic Chemistry, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (11 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (9 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (373 citations), Molecular Biology (1.3k citations) and Insect Science (124 citations). G. Edward Cartier has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Philippines. Frequent co-authors include Baldomero M. Olivera, J. Michael McIntosh, Doju Yoshikami, Siqin Luo, William R. Gray, Richard B. Jacobsen, Maren Watkins, Jennifer M. Kulak, Charles W. Luetje and Lourdes J. Cruz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.