G. E. Shankle

780 citations
19 papers · 693 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

G. E. Shankle

19 papers receiving 667 citations

Peers

G. E. Shankle
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 459
  • Inorganic Chemistry 304
  • Condensed Matter Physics 102
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 67
  • Materials Chemistry 318
Replace W.J.A. Maaskant with:
W.J.A. Maaskant Netherlands
T. Wasiutyński Poland
S. Mitra Australia
H. Ptasiewicz‐Bąk Poland
S. Chittipeddi United States
Arthur H. Reis United States
Anthony K. Gregson Australia
Philippe De Loth France
Yoshiyuki Morioka Japan
Marek Duczmal Poland
G. E. Shankle relative to W.J.A. Maaskant Netherlands W.J.A. Maaskant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
W.J.A. Maaskant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. E. Shankle

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. E. Shankle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. E. Shankle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. E. Shankle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. E. Shankle

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. E. Shankle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. E. Shankle. The network helps show where G. E. Shankle may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. E. Shankle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. E. Shankle Line = papers co-authored together G. E. Shankle links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 200056
2 20006
3 199944
4 1998238
5 19981
6 199613
7 199620
8 199515
9 19945
10 199411
11 199468
12 19777
13 197729
14 19766
15 197431
16 1973117
17 197213
18 197212
19 19651

About G. E. Shankle

G. E. Shankle is a scholar working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Inorganic Chemistry, Filtration and Separation, Ceramics and Composites and Condensed Matter Physics, having authored 19 papers that have together received 693 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Magnetism in coordination complexes (11 papers), Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes (6 papers), Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (4 papers), Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (4 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (3 papers), Organic and Molecular Conductors Research (3 papers), Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials (2 papers) and Luminescence Properties of Advanced Materials (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (459 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (304 citations), Condensed Matter Physics (102 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (67 citations) and Materials Chemistry (318 citations). G. E. Shankle has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Howard H. Patterson, Mohammad A. Omary, Zerihun Assefa, Thomas R. Webb, J. N. McElearney, Richard L. Carlin, Ward T. Robinson, D. Bruce Losee, R. Reynolds and S. Merchant. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Inorganica Chimica Acta, Inorganic Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B and Applied Superconductivity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026