G. Devereux
- Physiology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Nutrition and Dietetics
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- D.J. HendrickSC StentonKeith AllanFJ KellyA NicollL StellitanoR. G. WillKatherine Fishwick
- Topics
- Asthma and respiratory diseases (8 papers)Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (3 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
G. Devereux
20 papers receiving 555 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Physiology 254
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 210
- Molecular Biology 163
- Nutrition and Dietetics 65
- Neurology 63
Countries citing papers authored by G. Devereux
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Devereux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Devereux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Devereux more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Devereux
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Devereux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Devereux. The network helps show where G. Devereux may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Devereux
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Devereux. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Devereux based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Devereux. G. Devereux is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Reducing time before consulting with symptoms of lung cancer: randomised controlled trial | 1 |
| 7 | 102 | |
| 8 | 65 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 54 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Variations in neurodegenerative disease across the UK: findings from the national study of Progressive Intellectual and Neurological Deterioration (PIND). | 32 |
| 13 | 56 | |
| 14 | The epidemiology of food intolerance and food allergy | 2 |
| 15 | Why don9t we give chest patients dietary advice | 6 |
| 16 | 43 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 39 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About G. Devereux
G. Devereux is a scholar working on Immunology and Allergy, Process Chemistry and Technology and Physiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (8 papers), Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Immunology and Allergy (61 citations), Physiology (254 citations) and Neurology (63 citations). G. Devereux has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include D.J. Hendrick, SC Stenton, Keith Allan, FJ Kelly, A Nicoll, L Stellitano, R. G. Will, Katherine Fishwick, S. Bourke and Steve Turner. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.