G. David Kerlick
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Oceanography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Friedrich W. HehlPaul von der HeydeJames M. NesterF. B. GessnerDavid O. DavisDavid NixonG. H. KlopferEric A. Lord
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (14 papers)Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (9 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
G. David Kerlick
27 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 2.0k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.8k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 736
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 229
- Oceanography 132
Countries citing papers authored by G. David Kerlick
This map shows the geographic impact of G. David Kerlick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. David Kerlick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. David Kerlick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. David Kerlick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. David Kerlick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. David Kerlick. The network helps show where G. David Kerlick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. David Kerlick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. David Kerlick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. David Kerlick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. David Kerlick. G. David Kerlick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | Transonic potential flow | 2 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 62 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | General relativity with spin and torsion: Foundations and prospectsbreakdown → | 1679 |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 73 | |
| 20 | Spin and torsion in general relativity: Foundations, and implications for astrophysics and cosmology | 2 |
About G. David Kerlick
G. David Kerlick is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (14 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (9 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.8k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (2.0k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (736 citations). G. David Kerlick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Friedrich W. Hehl, Paul von der Heyde, James M. Nester, F. B. Gessner, David O. Davis, David Nixon, G. H. Klopfer, Eric A. Lord, Larry L. Smalley and Subhankar Banerjee. Their work appears in journals such as Reviews of Modern Physics, Physics Letters B and Journal of Applied Mechanics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.