Tahseen Qureshi

469 total citations
22 papers, 318 citations indexed

About

Tahseen Qureshi is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Tahseen Qureshi has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Oncology, 15 papers in Surgery and 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Tahseen Qureshi's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (17 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers). Tahseen Qureshi is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (17 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (6 papers). Tahseen Qureshi collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Argentina. Tahseen Qureshi's co-authors include Amjad Parvaiz, Sofoklis Panteleimonitis, Nuno Figueiredo, Mick Harper, Jianjun Zhang, Robert Howell, Xiaosong Yang, Tamas Hickish, Jian Chang and Sotirios Georgios Popeskou and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

Tahseen Qureshi

20 papers receiving 308 citations

Peers

Tahseen Qureshi
Fabien Leblanc United States
Joël L. Lavanchy Switzerland
Jenifer Barrie United Kingdom
Hubert Stein United States
D. Hashimoto United States
Jeffrey S. Levy United States
Tahseen Qureshi
Citations per year, relative to Tahseen Qureshi Tahseen Qureshi (= 1×) peers F. Borja de Lacy

Countries citing papers authored by Tahseen Qureshi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tahseen Qureshi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tahseen Qureshi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tahseen Qureshi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tahseen Qureshi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tahseen Qureshi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tahseen Qureshi. The network helps show where Tahseen Qureshi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tahseen Qureshi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tahseen Qureshi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tahseen Qureshi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tahseen Qureshi. Tahseen Qureshi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Koç, Mehmet Ali, Sofoklis Panteleimonitis, Mick Harper, et al.. (2024). Structured training pathway for robotic colorectal surgery: Short‐term outcomes from five UK centres. Colorectal Disease. 26(11). 1965–1970.
2.
Azevedo, José, Sofoklis Panteleimonitis, Danilo Mišković, et al.. (2023). Textbook Oncological Outcomes for Robotic Colorectal Cancer Resections: An Observational Study of Five Robotic Colorectal Units. Cancers. 15(15). 3760–3760. 8 indexed citations
3.
Battersby, Nick, et al.. (2022). Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Without Routine Gastro-Pancreatico-Colic Trunk Dissection: Survival Outcomes and Morbidity for 567 Cases. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 32(9). 938–947. 1 indexed citations
4.
Popeskou, Sotirios Georgios, et al.. (2022). Safety and Feasibility of a Discharge within 23 Hours after Colorectal Laparoscopic Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 11(17). 5068–5068. 7 indexed citations
5.
Zaidi, Habib, et al.. (2021). A tailored approach to abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: multicentre analysis of short-term outcomes and impact on oncological survival. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 406(3). 813–819. 1 indexed citations
6.
Ahmad, Mukhtar, Andrew Clarke, Guy F Nash, et al.. (2020). Minimally invasive surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic: An early single centre experience.. British journal of surgery. 107(11). e516–e517.
7.
Bullock, Marc D., et al.. (2019). Standardised approach to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective multi-centre analysis. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 404(5). 547–555. 12 indexed citations
8.
Ruiz, Marcos Gómez, Sergio Alfieri, Thomas Becker, et al.. (2019). Expert consensus on a train‐the‐trainer curriculum for robotic colorectal surgery. Colorectal Disease. 21(8). 903–908. 20 indexed citations
9.
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis, Oliver Pickering, Mukhtar Ahmad, et al.. (2019). Robotic rectal cancer surgery: Results from a European multicentre case series of 240 resections and comparative analysis between cases performed with the da Vinci Si and Xi systems. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(1). 6–11. 8 indexed citations
10.
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis, Oliver Pickering, Mick Harper, et al.. (2018). Robotic rectal cancer surgery in obese patients may lead to better short-term outcomes when compared to laparoscopy: a comparative propensity scored match study. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 33(8). 1079–1086. 32 indexed citations
11.
Figueiredo, Nuno, Sofoklis Panteleimonitis, Tahseen Qureshi, et al.. (2018). Delaying surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer has no influence in surgical approach or short-term clinical outcomes. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 44(4). 484–489. 18 indexed citations
12.
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis, Sotirios Georgios Popeskou, Mick Harper, et al.. (2018). Implementation of robotic rectal surgery training programme: importance of standardisation and structured training. Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery. 403(6). 749–760. 33 indexed citations
13.
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis, Sotirios Georgios Popeskou, Mick Harper, et al.. (2018). Minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the morbid obese: does size really matter?. Surgical Endoscopy. 32(8). 3486–3494. 20 indexed citations
14.
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis, et al.. (2017). Laparoscopic resection for primary and recurrent Crohn's disease: A case series of over 100 consecutive cases. International Journal of Surgery. 47. 69–76. 13 indexed citations
15.
Panteleimonitis, Sofoklis, Mick Harper, Stuart R. Hall, et al.. (2017). Precision in robotic rectal surgery using the da Vinci Xi system and integrated table motion, a technical note. Journal of Robotic Surgery. 12(3). 433–436. 23 indexed citations
17.
Chand, Manish, M. Siddiqui, S. Rasheed, et al.. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of laparoscopic surgical resection of transverse colon tumours. Surgical Endoscopy. 28(12). 3263–3272. 15 indexed citations
18.
Qureshi, Tahseen, et al.. (2014). Evolution in surgical training: what can we learn from professional coaches and elite athletes?. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 107(7). 290–292. 5 indexed citations
19.
Chang, Jian, Xiaosong Yang, Jianjun Zhang, et al.. (2011). Graphic and haptic simulation system for virtual laparoscopic rectum surgery. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 7(3). 304–317. 32 indexed citations
20.
Qureshi, Tahseen, et al.. (1999). A blistering rash and swollen knees. The Lancet. 353(9157). 978–978. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026