G. Baddeley
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 10%
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Papers in
-
- Chemical Reaction Mechanisms 5
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 3
- Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds 3
- Co-authors
- Ernest WenkertT. G. HalsallG. HoltE. R. H. JonesDwight W. MillerFrederick E. EvansThomas CairnsR. Thomas Williamson
- Journals
- Tetrahedron (6 papers)Australian Journal of Chemistry (4 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (2 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (2 papers)Phytochemistry (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
G. Baddeley
48 papers receiving 530 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Organic Chemistry 207
- Biochemistry 38
- Toxicology 16
- Molecular Biology 296
- Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 38
Countries citing papers authored by G. Baddeley
This map shows the geographic impact of G. Baddeley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Baddeley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Baddeley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. Baddeley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Baddeley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Baddeley. The network helps show where G. Baddeley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Baddeley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1981 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1979 | 12 | |
| 3 | 1978 | 158 | |
| 4 | 1978 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 18 | |
| 6 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 7 | 1967 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 10 | 1965 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1964 | 11 | |
| 12 | 1964 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 6 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 19 | |
| 15 | 1959 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1958 | 5 | |
| 17 | 1958 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1954 | 7 | |
| 19 | 1952 | 6 | |
| 20 | 1951 | 5 |
About G. Baddeley
G. Baddeley is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Pharmaceutical Science, Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy, having authored 51 papers that have together received 589 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (13 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (9 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (7 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (6 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (5 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers) and Synthesis and Reactions of Organic Compounds (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (207 citations), Biochemistry (38 citations), Toxicology (16 citations), Molecular Biology (296 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (38 citations). G. Baddeley has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ernest Wenkert, T. G. Halsall, G. Holt, E. R. H. Jones, Dwight W. Miller, Frederick E. Evans, Thomas Cairns, R. Thomas Williamson, R.W. Retallack and Chikara Kaneko. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron, Australian Journal of Chemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Phytochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.