F.W. Verheijen

1.4k total citations
30 papers, 878 citations indexed

About

F.W. Verheijen is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Physiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, F.W. Verheijen has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 878 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Molecular Biology, 11 papers in Physiology and 8 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in F.W. Verheijen's work include Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (8 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (7 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (6 papers). F.W. Verheijen is often cited by papers focused on Biomedical Research and Pathophysiology (8 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (7 papers) and Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research (6 papers). F.W. Verheijen collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Germany. F.W. Verheijen's co-authors include H. Galjaard, A. T. Hoogeveen, Grazia M.S. Mancini, Grazia M.S. Mancini, Cecile Beerens, Alessandra d’Azzo, Hugo R. de Jonge, Gijsbertus T. J. van der Horst, Adrie C. Havelaar and Niels Galjart and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

F.W. Verheijen

29 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

F.W. Verheijen
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Physiology 413
  • Molecular Biology 391
  • Cell Biology 212
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 162
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 140
Replace N. U. Bosshard with:
N. U. Bosshard Switzerland
Mae Wan Ho United Kingdom
Mireia Gómez-Angelats Spain
Jary S. Mayes United States
Amrit L. Rampal United States
R Rosa France
Laura Rita Rega Italy
Marie‐France Robert Canada
Hubert Carchon Belgium
Noel Edwards United Kingdom
N. U. Bosshard Switzerland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to F.W. Verheijen
F.W. Verheijen · 1×
Citations per year, relative to F.W. Verheijen
F.W. Verheijen · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by F.W. Verheijen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F.W. Verheijen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F.W. Verheijen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F.W. Verheijen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F.W. Verheijen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F.W. Verheijen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F.W. Verheijen. The network helps show where F.W. Verheijen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F.W. Verheijen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F.W. Verheijen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F.W. Verheijen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F.W. Verheijen. F.W. Verheijen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 5
2 2
3 1
4
Measuring LDL-cholesterol: are we doing it wrong?
2
5 24
6 14
7 24
8 28
9 13
10 2
11 20
12 18
13 61
14 20
15 86
16 6
17 26
18
Galactosialidosis: molecular heterogeneity among distinct clinical phenotypes.
33
19 4
20 114

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026