Friederike Stoll
- Molecular Biology
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 5%
- Physiology
- Organic Chemistry
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Alexander HillischHolger GohlkeNadine HomeyerIngo V. HartungHartmut SchirokMartina SchäferJohannes‐Peter StaschMarkus Follmann
- Topics
- Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers)Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers)Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers)
- Journals
- Angewandte Chemie International EditionSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFEBS Letters
- Partner nations
- GermanyFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Friederike Stoll
16 papers receiving 522 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Molecular Biology 274
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 130
- Physiology 112
- Organic Chemistry 66
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 59
Countries citing papers authored by Friederike Stoll
This map shows the geographic impact of Friederike Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friederike Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friederike Stoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friederike Stoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friederike Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friederike Stoll. The network helps show where Friederike Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friederike Stoll
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friederike Stoll. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friederike Stoll based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friederike Stoll. Friederike Stoll is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Using the Causal Inference Framework to Support Individualized Drug Treatment Decisions Based on Observational Healthcare Data | 1 |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 61 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 140 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 159 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | Preparation of phthalazinones as soluble guanylate cyclase inhibitors | 0 |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 25 | |
| 16 | 51 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Friederike Stoll
Friederike Stoll is a scholar working on Toxicology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Physiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers) and Cancer Risks and Factors (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (130 citations), Physiology (112 citations) and Molecular Biology (274 citations). Friederike Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Hillisch, Holger Gohlke, Nadine Homeyer, Ingo V. Hartung, Hartmut Schirok, Martina Schäfer, Johannes‐Peter Stasch, Markus Follmann, Joachim Mittendorf and Michael G. Hahn. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and FEBS Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.