Friederike Deeken
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- General Health Professions
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Michael A. RappAlba SánchezJohanna NordheimPaul GellertNina RieckmannNina KnollChristine A. F. Von ArnimTobias Banaschewski
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers)Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineDevelopmental NeuroscienceAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Journals
- American Journal of Geriatric PsychiatryFrontiers in Aging NeuroscienceInternational Psychogeriatrics
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandCanada
In The Last Decade
Friederike Deeken
7 papers receiving 168 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Psychiatry and Mental health 67
- General Health Professions 58
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 49
- Clinical Psychology 39
- Sociology and Political Science 32
Countries citing papers authored by Friederike Deeken
This map shows the geographic impact of Friederike Deeken's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Friederike Deeken with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Friederike Deeken more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Friederike Deeken
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Friederike Deeken. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Friederike Deeken. The network helps show where Friederike Deeken may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Friederike Deeken
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Friederike Deeken. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Friederike Deeken based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Friederike Deeken. Friederike Deeken is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 29 |
About Friederike Deeken
Friederike Deeken is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (49 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (28 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (26 citations). Friederike Deeken has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Rapp, Alba Sánchez, Johanna Nordheim, Paul Gellert, Nina Rieckmann, Nina Knoll, Christine A. F. Von Arnim, Tobias Banaschewski, Lars O. Conzelmann and Christine Thomas. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience and International Psychogeriatrics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.