Frederick W. Smith

2.5k citations
55 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick W. Smith

54 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Frederick W. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 1.3k
  • Global and Planetary Change 1.5k
  • Ecology 616
  • Insect Science 197
  • Environmental Engineering 196
Replace Ulrich Kohnle with:
Ulrich Kohnle Germany
Robert S. Seymour United States
Ralph L. Amateis United States
Don C. Bragg United States
Hiroaki Ishii Japan
Helena M. Henttonen Finland
W. L. Mason United Kingdom
Réjean Gagnon Canada
Jérôme Chave France
Timothy B. Harrington United States
Frederick W. Smith relative to Ulrich Kohnle Germany Ulrich Kohnle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ulrich Kohnle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Smith. The network helps show where Frederick W. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Frederick W. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick W. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Frederick W. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 55 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984140
2 2001134
3 1988112
4 2006108
5 1988104
6 199189
7 199289
8
Factors influencing the amount and distribution of leaf area of pine stands
199486
9 200582
10 199078
11 198967
12 198165
13 200858
14 199755
15 199951
16 200851
17 199351
18 200550
19 199750
20 201043

About Frederick W. Smith

Frederick W. Smith is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Insect Science and Plant Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (26 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (20 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (13 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (12 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (10 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (8 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.3k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.5k citations), Ecology (616 citations), Insect Science (197 citations) and Environmental Engineering (196 citations). Frederick W. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Russia. Frequent co-authors include James N. Long, Wayne D. Shepperd, Leigh B. Lentile, Tara L. Keyser, Gregory H. Aplet, Richard D. Laven, Mike A. Battaglia, David A. Sampson, Sigrid C. Resh and David R. Scott. Their work appears in journals such as Forest Ecology and Management, Forest Science, Canadian Journal of Forest Research, Western Journal of Applied Forestry and International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact