Frederick W. Mayer

1.8k total citations
24 papers, 976 citations indexed

About

Frederick W. Mayer is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick W. Mayer has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 976 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Strategy and Management, 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Frederick W. Mayer's work include Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (9 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (4 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers). Frederick W. Mayer is often cited by papers focused on Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (9 papers), International Labor and Employment Law (4 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers). Frederick W. Mayer collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frederick W. Mayer's co-authors include Gary Gereffi, Nicola Phillips, John Pickles, Thomas Bernauer, Anne Caroline Posthuma, Stephanie Barrientos, Emily Diamond, William Milberg, Philip Zelikow and John R. MacArthur and has published in prestigious journals such as Foreign Affairs, International Organization and Political Science Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Frederick W. Mayer

22 papers receiving 871 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick W. Mayer United States 12 519 289 276 141 125 24 976
Matthew Amengual United States 13 667 1.3× 274 0.9× 201 0.7× 63 0.4× 114 0.9× 20 1.1k
Peter Utting United States 17 499 1.0× 132 0.5× 226 0.8× 62 0.4× 109 0.9× 39 1.0k
D. Hugh Whittaker United Kingdom 16 331 0.6× 160 0.6× 191 0.7× 94 0.7× 65 0.5× 49 807
Gary Teeple Canada 9 121 0.2× 307 1.1× 493 1.8× 72 0.5× 26 0.2× 21 1.1k
Kate Macdonald Australia 16 307 0.6× 187 0.6× 216 0.8× 23 0.2× 43 0.3× 48 688
Peter Knorringa Netherlands 17 665 1.3× 149 0.5× 271 1.0× 246 1.7× 586 4.7× 48 1.5k
Duncan Green United Kingdom 12 132 0.3× 260 0.9× 365 1.3× 132 0.9× 23 0.2× 52 1.1k
A. Claire Cutler Canada 15 566 1.1× 499 1.7× 365 1.3× 53 0.4× 15 0.1× 32 1.3k
Christina Stringer New Zealand 15 419 0.8× 69 0.2× 253 0.9× 66 0.5× 100 0.8× 52 757
Arthur A. Goldsmith United States 20 142 0.3× 289 1.0× 660 2.4× 117 0.8× 41 0.3× 57 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick W. Mayer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick W. Mayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick W. Mayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick W. Mayer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick W. Mayer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick W. Mayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick W. Mayer. The network helps show where Frederick W. Mayer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick W. Mayer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick W. Mayer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick W. Mayer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick W. Mayer. Frederick W. Mayer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Diamond, Emily, Thomas Bernauer, & Frederick W. Mayer. (2020). Does providing scientific information affect climate change and GMO policy preferences of the mass public? Insights from survey experiments in Germany and the United States. Environmental Politics. 29(7). 1199–1218. 35 indexed citations
2.
Mayer, Frederick W. & Nicola Phillips. (2019). Global inequality and the Trump administration. Review of International Studies. 45(3). 502–510. 6 indexed citations
3.
Bernauer, Thomas, et al.. (2018). Beyond Political Ideology: The Impact of Attitudes Towards Government and Corporations on Trust in Science. Science Communication. 40(3). 291–313. 81 indexed citations
4.
Mayer, Frederick W. & Nicola Phillips. (2017). Outsourcing governance: states and the politics of a ‘global value chain world’. New Political Economy. 22(2). 134–152. 137 indexed citations
5.
Mayer, Frederick W., Nicola Phillips, & Anne Caroline Posthuma. (2016). The political economy of governance in a ‘global value chain world’. New Political Economy. 22(2). 129–133. 41 indexed citations
6.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (2015). A Setting For Excellence: The Story of the Planning and Development of the Ann Arbor Campus of the University of Michigan. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University). 1 indexed citations
7.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (2014). Narrative Politics: Stories and Collective Action. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 36 indexed citations
8.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (2014). Narrative Politics. Oxford University Press eBooks. 57 indexed citations
9.
Mayer, Frederick W. & William Milberg. (2013). Aid for Trade in a World of Global Value Chains: Chain Power, the Distribution of Rents and Implications for the Form of Aid. SSRN Electronic Journal. 9 indexed citations
10.
Barrientos, Stephanie, Frederick W. Mayer, John Pickles, & Anne Caroline Posthuma. (2011). Travail décent et réseaux de production mondiaux: construire le débat politique. Revue internationale du Travail. 150(3-4). 325–345. 2 indexed citations
11.
Barrientos, Stephanie, Frederick W. Mayer, John Pickles, & Anne Caroline Posthuma. (2011). Trabajo decente en las redes productivas mundiales. Marco del debate programático. Revista Internacional del Trabajo. 130(3-4). 325–346. 2 indexed citations
12.
Barrientos, Stephanie, Frederick W. Mayer, John Pickles, & Anne Caroline Posthuma. (2011). Decent work in global production networks: Framing the policy debate. International Labour Review. 150(3-4). 297–317. 83 indexed citations
13.
Mayer, Frederick W. & John Pickles. (2010). Re-Embedding Governance: Global Apparel Value Chains and Decent Work. SSRN Electronic Journal. 38 indexed citations
14.
Mayer, Frederick W. & Gary Gereffi. (2010). Regulation and Economic Globalization: Prospects and Limits of Private Governance. Business and Politics. 12(3). 1–25. 244 indexed citations
15.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (2001). Conflict Amid Consensus in American Trade Policy. Political Science Quarterly. 116(2). 324–325. 3 indexed citations
16.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (2000). . 6(3). 335–346. 1 indexed citations
17.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (1999). Interpreting NAFTA: the science and art of political analysis. Choice Reviews Online. 36(9). 36–5201. 65 indexed citations
18.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (1992). Basketball and Public Management: Testing What's Important. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 11(2). 322–322.
19.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (1992). Managing domestic differences in international negotiations: the strategic use of internal side-payments. International Organization. 46(4). 793–818. 96 indexed citations
20.
Mayer, Frederick W.. (1980). The Implementable Plan.. Planning for higher education. 8(4). 1–6. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026