Emily Diamond

1.0k total citations
22 papers, 784 citations indexed

About

Emily Diamond is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Diamond has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 784 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 5 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Emily Diamond's work include Climate Change Communication and Perception (10 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (7 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (5 papers). Emily Diamond is often cited by papers focused on Climate Change Communication and Perception (10 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (7 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (5 papers). Emily Diamond collaborates with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Canada. Emily Diamond's co-authors include Rosemarie M. Bowler, Sanae Nakagawa, Harry A. Roels, William C. Koller, Donna Mergler, Russell P. Bowler, Donald R. Smith, R. Gwiazda, Milka Drezgić and Michèle Bouchard and has published in prestigious journals such as Climatic Change, Journal of Media Literacy Education and Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Emily Diamond

19 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Diamond United States 10 472 200 107 73 66 22 784
Maud Hagman Sweden 17 255 0.5× 70 0.3× 86 0.8× 108 1.5× 57 0.9× 30 993
Paul King United States 19 412 0.9× 156 0.8× 13 0.1× 48 0.7× 41 0.6× 40 1.1k
Silvia Zoni Italy 18 785 1.7× 433 2.2× 35 0.3× 85 1.2× 33 0.5× 24 1.1k
Aisha S. Dickerson United States 21 465 1.0× 214 1.1× 29 0.3× 82 1.1× 54 0.8× 54 930
Marco Peli Italy 12 365 0.8× 166 0.8× 22 0.2× 37 0.5× 41 0.6× 25 545
Patricia H. Field United States 6 648 1.4× 226 1.1× 129 1.2× 31 0.4× 30 0.5× 6 886
Jaime Raymond United States 14 252 0.5× 62 0.3× 90 0.8× 20 0.3× 29 0.4× 34 1.0k
Richard Hornung United States 6 356 0.8× 101 0.5× 63 0.6× 16 0.2× 22 0.3× 7 536
Leo H. Buchanan United States 20 960 2.0× 233 1.2× 45 0.4× 30 0.4× 51 0.8× 39 1.3k
Xianwen Chen China 18 243 0.5× 15 0.1× 52 0.5× 90 1.2× 38 0.6× 65 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Diamond

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Diamond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Diamond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Diamond more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Diamond

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Diamond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Diamond. The network helps show where Emily Diamond may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Diamond

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Diamond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Diamond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Diamond. Emily Diamond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Diamond, Emily, et al.. (2025). Public Communication of Climate and Justice: A Scoping Review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change. 16(1).
2.
Wetts, Rachel, Maxwell Boykoff, James Painter, et al.. (2025). Climate media amidst technopolitical change: challenges, transformations, and new directions for research. Climatic Change. 178(6). 1 indexed citations
3.
4.
Smythe, Tiffany, et al.. (2025). Communication silos: A governance network approach to the offshore wind planning and permitting process. Energy Research & Social Science. 129. 104328–104328. 1 indexed citations
5.
Diamond, Emily, et al.. (2024). Angler’s sense of place as an indicator for perceived vulnerability to shifting stock distributions. Marine Policy. 161. 106007–106007. 2 indexed citations
6.
Diamond, Emily, et al.. (2024). Framing the Wind: Media Coverage of Offshore Wind in the Northeastern United States. Environmental Communication. 19(2). 161–178. 3 indexed citations
7.
Diamond, Emily, et al.. (2024). “The Ocean is a Part of Me”: The Importance of Coastal Place Attachment to Well-Being and Implications for Coastal Access Management. Coastal Management. 52(4-5). 215–233. 1 indexed citations
8.
Diamond, Emily, et al.. (2024). Legitimacy through representation? Media sources and discourses of offshore wind development. Frontiers in Communication. 9. 3 indexed citations
9.
Gordon, Amie M. & Emily Diamond. (2023). Feeling understood and appreciated in relationships: Where do these perceptions come from and why do they matter?. Current Opinion in Psychology. 53. 101687–101687. 3 indexed citations
10.
Diamond, Emily, et al.. (2022). The Impact of Message Valence on Climate Change Attitudes: A Longitudinal Experiment. Environmental Communication. 16(8). 1046–1058. 10 indexed citations
11.
Diamond, Emily. (2021). Understanding Rural Identities and Environmental Policy Attitudes in America. Perspectives on Politics. 21(2). 502–518. 23 indexed citations
12.
Diamond, Emily, et al.. (2021). Whose policy is it anyway? Public support for clean energy policy depends on the message and the messenger. Environmental Politics. 31(6). 991–1015. 20 indexed citations
13.
Diamond, Emily. (2020). The Influence of Identity Salience on Framing Effectiveness: An Experiment. Political Psychology. 41(6). 1133–1150. 35 indexed citations
14.
Diamond, Emily, Thomas Bernauer, & Frederick W. Mayer. (2020). Does providing scientific information affect climate change and GMO policy preferences of the mass public? Insights from survey experiments in Germany and the United States. Environmental Politics. 29(7). 1199–1218. 35 indexed citations
15.
Bowler, Rosemarie M., Sanae Nakagawa, Harry A. Roels, et al.. (2006). Sequelae of fume exposure in confined space welding: A neurological and neuropsychological case series. NeuroToxicology. 28(2). 298–311. 105 indexed citations
16.
Bowler, Rosemarie M., Sanae Nakagawa, Milka Drezgić, et al.. (2006). Dose–effect relationships between manganese exposure and neurological, neuropsychological and pulmonary function in confined space bridge welders. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 64(3). 167–177. 221 indexed citations
17.
Park, Robert M., Rosemarie M. Bowler, Donald E. Eggerth, et al.. (2005). Issues in neurological risk assessment for occupational exposures: The Bay Bridge welders. NeuroToxicology. 27(3). 373–384. 40 indexed citations
18.
Bowler, Rosemarie M., et al.. (2005). Manganese exposure: Neuropsychological and neurological symptoms and effects in welders. NeuroToxicology. 27(3). 315–326. 185 indexed citations
19.
Bowler, Rosemarie M., et al.. (2003). Neuropsychological sequelae of exposure to welding fumes in a group of occupationally exposed men. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. 206(6). 517–529. 90 indexed citations
20.
Diamond, Emily. (1976). Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.. PubMed. 11(2). 589–614. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Maud Hagman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paul King Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Silvia Zoni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aisha S. Dickerson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marco Peli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia H. Field Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jaime Raymond Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Richard Hornung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leo H. Buchanan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Xianwen Chen
Rankless by CCL
2026