Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Duncan Green's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Duncan Green with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Duncan Green more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Duncan Green. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Duncan Green. The network helps show where Duncan Green may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Duncan Green
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Duncan Green.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Duncan Green based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Duncan Green. Duncan Green is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Green, Duncan & Irene Guijt. (2019). Adaptive Programming in Fragile, Conflict and Violence-Affected Settings. What Works and Under What Conditions? The Case of Institutions for Inclusive Development, Tanzania. Figshare.1 indexed citations
5.
Green, Duncan, et al.. (2018). Adaptive Programming in Fragile, Conflict and Violence-Affected Settings, What Works and Under What Conditions?: The Case of Pyoe Pin, Myanmar. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).4 indexed citations
6.
Green, Duncan. (2017). Theories of Change for Promoting Empowerment and Accountability in Fragile and Conflict-Affected Settings. OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).1 indexed citations
7.
Green, Duncan. (2015). The ‘We Can’ Campaign in South Asia.3 indexed citations
8.
Green, Duncan & Anna Macdonald. (2015). Power and Change: The Arms Trade Treaty.2 indexed citations
9.
Green, Duncan, et al.. (2012). How Can a Post-2015 Agreement Drive Real Change? Revised Edition: The political economy of global commitments. Issue Lab (Candid).1 indexed citations
10.
Green, Duncan. (2010). Inequality : why is it back on the development agenda?. Africanus Journal of Development Studies. 40(1). 32–42.1 indexed citations
11.
Green, Duncan & Richard King. (2010). The Global Economic Crisis and Developing Countries: Impact and Response.26 indexed citations
12.
Green, Duncan. (2008). Equality, Inequality, and Equity: Where do these fit in the poverty agenda?.
13.
Green, Duncan. (2005). Conspiracy of silence: old and new directions on commodities.. 93–127.11 indexed citations
14.
Lawson, Max & Duncan Green. (2005). Gleneagles: What really happened at the G8 summit?.1 indexed citations
Green, Duncan. (1978). Multiculturalism in Education. Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes. 34(4). 662–667.7 indexed citations
20.
Green, Duncan. (1975). The involvement of the public in education: a major development.. Education Canada.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.